Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Xenograft recipients and the right to withdraw from a clinical trial

Bibliographic Data

ID21504066
AuthorsChris Bobier (0000-0003-4194-4721, Department of Theology and Philosophy, Associate Director, Hendrickson Institute for Ethical Leadership St. Mary's University of Minnesota Winona Minnesota USA, corresponding author), Daniel J Hurst (0000-0003-0592-2592, Department of Family Medicine Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine Stratford New Jersey USA), Daniel Rodger (0000-0002-2121-7167, Institute of Health and Social Care, School of Allied and Community Health London South Bank University London UK), Adam Omelianchuk (0000-0003-3241-2870, Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA)
Year2024
Volume38
Issue4
Pages308-315
Publication date2024-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBioethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0269-9702 • E-ISSN: 1467-8519
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/bioe.13262
PMID38183638
OpenAlexW4390637278
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Preclinical xenotransplantation research using genetically engineered pigs has begun to show some promising results and could one day offer a scalable means of addressing organ shortage. While it is a fundamental tenet of ethical human subject research that participants have a right to withdraw from research once enrolled, several scholars have argued that the right to withdraw from xenotransplant research should be suspended because of the public health risks posed by xenozoonotic transmission. Here, we present a comprehensive critical evaluation of the claim that xenotransplant recipients should be required to waive their right to withdraw from lifelong biosurveillance. We conclude that if xenotransplantation requires participants to waive their right to withdraw, then clinical trials may not be justifiable, given the ethical and legal obstacles involved with doing so. Consequently, if clinical trials are permitted with a right to withdraw, then they may pose a significant public health risk

Bioethics · Clinical trial · Economic shortage · Human rights · Pathology · Political science · Right to health · Xenotransplantation · Law · Medicine · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Pluripotent Stem Cells Research · Xenotransplantation and immune response · Surgery · Transplantation

  • The promise of xenotransplantation

    Chris Bobier, Adam Omelianchuk et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • Transparency in Biotech Governance

    Open Access•Johannes Kögel, Georg Marckmann•NanoEthics•2026

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae