The Declaration of Helsinki in bioethics literature since the last revision in 2013

Bibliographic Data

ID21504138
AuthorsHans‐Jörg Ehni (0000-0001-5900-2228, Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin Universität Tübingen Tübingen Germany, corresponding author), Urban Wiesing (0000-0003-4957-4323, Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin Universität Tübingen Tübingen Germany)
Year2024
Volume38
Issue4
Pages335-343
Publication date2024-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBioethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0269-9702 • E-ISSN: 1467-8519
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/bioe.13270
PMID38367022
OpenAlexW4391896645
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited4

The World Medical Association has announced that a new revision process of the Declaration of Helsinki has been started. This article will identify the criticisms that have been made in the bioethics literature, particularly since the last revision. In addition, criticisms are discussed that were made in the literature even before the last revision and have not fallen silent. The plausibility of the recommendation for a change in the Declaration of Helsinki is examined

Alternative medicine · Bioethics · Declaration · Declaration of Helsinki · Helsinki declaration · Informed consent · Pathology · Political science · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Medicine

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access