The importance of developing care‐worker‐centered robotic aides in long‐term care
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21504160 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Iva Apostolova (0000-0002-2701-175X, Faculty of Philosophy Dominican University College Ottawa Ontario Canada, corresponding author), Monique Lanoix (0000-0001-7948-3399, Faculty of Philosophy St. Paul University Ottawa Ontario Canada) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 170-177 |
| Publication date | 2022-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bioethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-9702 • E-ISSN: 1467-8519 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/bioe.12968 |
| PMID | 34672015 |
| OpenAlex | W3207230162 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Recent research points to the fact that new medical technological innovations are just as relevant in the context of long‐term care or chronic care as they are in the context of acute care. In the spirit of the Nuffield Foundation recommendations, this paper explores the possibilities of using robotic aides in long‐term care and identifies the tensions that must be considered and addressed if robotics is to be introduced successfully in nursing homes. Our examination is two‐pronged. First, we delve into a fundamental issue surrounding AI, namely that of consciousness. We argue that automation will always have only a limited use in caregiving since caregiving as an activity requires the use of human‐type, that is, organic, consciousness. We support the thesis that the emergence and formation of human‐type consciousness require feelings such as empathy and the sense of touch, which, in turn, create the sense of kinship with fellow human beings. And second, we examine the benefits as well as risks of using robotic aides such as ZORA and PARO in long‐term care facilities. More specifically, we look at ZORA's use in a group setting, and PARO's use in an individual setting. We emphasize that long‐term care is one‐on‐one care, including but not limited to intimate care. Crucially, we argue that touch is at the heart of this type of care. We argue that some of the tensions with the use of robotic aides are generated precisely because of the lack of human touch
Compassion · Consciousness · Dignity · Empathy · Feeling · Long-term care · Political science · Public relations · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Law · Medicine · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2024 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |