Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Market integration of white teff ( Eragrostis tef ) in Ethiopia

A parity bound model

Bibliographic Data

ID21510176
AuthorsDereje Gebeyehu Ababu (0000-0002-6236-9968, Université d'Abomey-Calavi, corresponding author), Sylvain Kpenavoun Chogou (0000-0003-0717-3599, Université d'Abomey-Calavi), Epiphane Sodjinou (0000-0002-6350-2273, Université de Parakou)
Year2025
Volume64
Issue2
Pages217-234
Publication date2025-04-03
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAgrekon (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0303-1853 • E-ISSN: 2078-0400
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03031853.2025.2522343
OpenAlexW4414050166
LanguageEN
References cited50

Agriculture drives economic growth, food security, and employment in developing countries, while efficient markets enhance trade and optimise resource allocation, though disparities and the need for reforms remain. This study aims to analyze the vertical market integration of white teff (Eragrostis tef) between North Shewa Zone districts’ and Addis Ababa markets and to assess the impact of COVID-19 on market integration. This study addresses two research questions: (1) Is there vertical market integration of white teff between the North Shewa Zone districts’ and Addis Ababa markets? (2) Does COVID-19 have an impact on vertical market integration of white teff? Secondary data on prices of white teff was collected from government offices, while primary data on transaction costs (TC) and related variables was collected from traders. The Parity Bound Model (PBM) and Extended Parity Bound Model (EPBM) are used to analyze vertical market integration and assess the impact of COVID-19 on market integration, respectively. The t-test revealed that the majority of the markets have significant price differences (p-value = 0.68) while other markets are segmented (λ3 > = 0.72). EPBM results show a decrease in probabilities for regime one (λ1 = 0.13, δ1 = −0.13) and regime two (λ2 = 0.13, δ2 = −0.13) and an increase for regime three (λ3 = 0.75, δ3 = 0.255), but the likelihood ratio test (χ2cal = 1.842; χ2(2) = 5.99) revealed no significant change on market integration due to COVID-19. To enhance rural market integration, it's recommended to improve infrastructure such as roads and market information systems

Interest rate parity · Market integration · Numerical integration · Upper and lower bounds · Agricultural Economics and Practices · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets

  • Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration — With Applications to the Demand for Money

    Open Access•Søren Johansen, Katarina Juselius•Oxford Bulletin of Economics and…•1990

  • Determinants of teff commercialization among smallholder farmers

    Open Access•Adugnaw Anteneh, Birara Endalew•Cogent Social Sciences•2023

  • The effect of Covid-19 pandemic on market integration

    Open Access•Ayat Ullah, Ashok K Mishra et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2022

  • Testing for food market integration revisited

    Bob Baulch•The Journal of Development Studies•1997

  • Cointegration and Threshold Adjustment

    Walter Enders, Pierre L Siklos•Journal of Business and Economic…•2001

  • Determinants of spatial market efficiency of grain markets in Russia

    Open Access•Miranda Svanidze, Linde Götz•Food Policy•2019

  • Using agriculture for development

    Open Access•Alain De Janvry, Elisabeth Sadoulet•World Development•2020

  • Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors

    Open Access•Søren Johansen•Journal of Economic Dynamics and…•1988

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae