Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Proposing a farm assessment toolkit

Evaluating a South African land reform case study

Bibliographic Data

ID21510233
AuthorsAart-Jan Verschoor (Agricultural Research Council– Agrimetrics, Hatfield, Pretoria, corresponding author), Colleta Gandidzanwa (0000-0001-9596-2453, Future Africa Institute, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria), Terence Newby (GeoTerraImage (Pty) Ltd. AgriHub Business Park, Willows, Pretoria), Anneliza Collett (Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD), Riviera, Pretoria), S L Venter (0000-0003-0513-1029, Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria), Sonja Venter (Agricultural Research Council -Vegetables, Industrial and Medicinal Plants, Roodeplaat, Pretoria)
Year2023
Volume62
Issue3-4
Pages215-227
Publication date2023-10-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAgrekon (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0303-1853 • E-ISSN: 2078-0400
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03031853.2023.2279159
OpenAlexW4389568922
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited23

The paper presents a robust, scientific evaluation method to determine the potential viability of a farm, compared to its current performance. The comparison informs recommendations for sustainable farm development. The process entails a stepwise analysis of land suitability, enterprise potential, infrastructure status, operator capacity, inherent limitations and external risks of the farm. An expert panel considers quantitative and qualitative data to establish suitable development measures. Applied to a land reform initiative, ±2000 farms entailing 1.86 million hectares were evaluated, detailing corrective measures for each farm. Roughly 59% of the evaluated farms were potentially commercial, but only 7% performed accordingly. Correlations between farmer capability and farm performance, as well as between infrastructure and performance, were evident, indicating that post-settlement support is vital. As risk and limitation scores increased, farm viability tended to decrease. The tool accurately determined viability based on available resources (natural and physical), resulting in evidence-based policy advice. The evaluation informed land reform policy recommendations, proposing more coordinated support to improve access to services. The tool would also be useful for farmers to reflect on enterprise performance. The visual, sequential nature of the evaluation facilitates sound decision-making. The tool has potential as a valid agricultural development evaluation instrument

Agriculture · Business · Economics · Environmental economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Political science · Sustainable development · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Computer Science · Land Rights and Reforms · Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis · Finance

  • Does farm location matter? Assessing emerging farmers’ climate change awareness in South Africa

    Open Access•Siphe Zantsi, Sukoluhle Mazwane et al.•International Journal of Social…•2026

  • South Africa’s land redistribution

    Open Access•Siphe Zantsi, Gabriele Mack et al.•Agrekon•2025

  • What happens on land reform farms in South Africa? A field-based reality check

    Open Access•R Hall, Thembela Kepe•Agrekon•2026

  • Land Reform in Developing Countries

    Michael Lipton•Land reform in developing countries•2009

  • Land redistribution in South Africa’s land reform policy

    Siphe Zantsi, Jan Greyling•Agrekon•2021

  • The Number, Size, and Distribution of Farms, Smallholder Farms, and Family Farms Worldwide

    Open Access•Sarah K Lowder, Jakob Skoet et al.•World Development•2016

  • Land Tenure and Agricultural Productivity in Africa

    Open Access•Francis Place, Frank Place•World Development•2009

  • The Sorry State of M&E in Agriculture

    Open Access•Lawrence Haddad, Johanna Lindstrom et al.•IDS Bulletin•2010

  • Elite Capture in South Africa's Land Redistribution

    Farai Mtero, Nkanyiso Gumede et al.•Journal of Southern African Studies•2023

Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae