Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Treatment Evaluation in Forensic Psychiatry. Which One Should Be Used

The Clinical Judgment or the Instrument-based Assessment of Change

Bibliographic Data

ID21513664
AuthorsErwin Schuringa (0000-0002-5010-9237, FPC Dr. S. van Mesdag, Groningen, The Netherlands, corresponding author), Marinus Spreen (0000-0002-1673-1380, NHLStenden University of Applied Sciences, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands), Stefan Bogaert (0000-0003-3776-3792, Tilburg University)
Year2022
Volume66
Issue16
Pages1821-1836
Publication date2022-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-624X • E-ISSN: 1552-6933
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0306624x211023921
PMID34114499
OpenAlexW3166758414
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited47

In forensic psychiatry, it is common practice to use an unstructured clinical judgment for treatment evaluation. From risk assessment studies, it is known that the unstructured clinical judgment is unreliable and the use of instruments is recommended. This paper aims to explore the clinical judgment of change compared to the calculated change using the Instrument for Forensic Treatment Evaluation (IFTE) in relation to changes in inpatient violence This study shows that the clinical judgment is much more positive about patient’s behavioral changes than the calculated change. And that the calculated change is more in accordance with the change in the occurrence of inpatient violence, suggesting that the calculated change reflects reality closer than the unstructured clinical judgment. Therefore, it is advisable to use the IFTE as a base to make a structured professional judgment of the treatment evaluation of a forensic psychiatric patient

Forensic psychiatry · Forensic science · Psychiatry · Medicine · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

  • Multidisciplinary Routine Outcome Monitoring in Forensic Psychiatry

    Open Access•Sophie Verschueren, Ruben van den Ameele et al.•International Journal of Offender…•2026

  • Exploring the Black Box of Community Supervision

    James Bonta, Tanya Rugge et al.•Journal of Offender Rehabilitation•2008

  • The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment

    Open Access•D A Andrews, James Bonta et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2006

  • Classification for Effective Rehabilitation

    Open Access•D A Andrews, James Bonta et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•1990

  • Clinical Versus Actuarial Judgment

    Open Access•Robyn M Dawes, David Faust et al.•Science•1989

  • Clinical versus mechanical prediction

    William M Grove, David H Zald et al.•Psychological Assessment•2000

  • Clinical significance

    Neil S Jacobson, Paula Truax•Journal of Consulting and…•1991

  • Clinical judgements

    Open Access•Ian Bell, Ian H Bell et al.•Australian Psychologist•2009

  • The Meta-Analysis of Clinical Judgment Project

    Open Access•Stefanía Ægisdóttir, Michael J White et al.•The Counseling Psychologist•2006

  • The Meta-Analysis of Clinical Judgment Project

    Open Access•Paul M Spengler, Michael J White et al.•The Counseling Psychologist•2007

  • Violence risk assessment

    Kevin S Douglas, Jennifer L Skeem•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2005

  • Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice

    D A Andrews, James Bonta•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2010

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae