Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is the right not to know an instance of ‘bad faith’

Bibliographic Data

ID21514709
AuthorsAisha Deslandes (Houston, Texas, USA, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume46
Issue5
Pages308-308
Publication date2020-05-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/medethics-2020-106145
PMID32350035
OpenAlexW3021518611
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited1

The ‘right not to know’ (RNTK) can be used by patients as a safeguard against the effects that certain medical information can have on their well-being. At first glance, one might reason it suitable for a patient to enact their RNTK. However, although Davies states that RNTK gives people the ability to both protect themselves from self-perceived harm and exercise their autonomy, I will argue that ‘not knowing’ hinders patients’ ability to exercise their existential freedom and represents what Sartre calls an instance of ‘bad faith’. Davies argues that the RNTK takes precedence over many related issues and objections associated with a patient’s decision to implement such a resolution.1 Fundamentally, the RNTK gives patients power to protect themselves from subjective harm and to exercise their autonomy. In most cases, objectors of RNTK cite the negative impact on the patient’s state of health, which affects not only the patient but also those persons who would also be negatively affected by patient health outcomes. For the majority of objectors, patients have moral obligations to lessen the degree of burden on others, which refusal can initiate. However, Davies concludes, ‘...the burden placed on others is not sufficiently significant

Autonomy · Bad faith · Bodily integrity · Epistemology · Existentialism · Faith · Harm · Health care · Personal autonomy · Political science · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Medicine · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • ‘The right not to know and the obligation to know’, response to commentaries

    Open Access•Ben Davies•Journal of Medical Ethics•2020

  • The right not to know and the obligation to know

    Open Access•Ben Davies•Journal of Medical Ethics•2020

Citations per year0.17
Citation span2020 - 2020 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae