Defending deference
Author’s response to commentaries
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21514779 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicholas Makins (0000-0001-8935-6940, King's College London, London, UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 763-764 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257 |
| Publisher | BMJ (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1136/jme-2023-109539 |
| PMID | 37673668 |
| OpenAlex | W4386470480 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
Data science · Deference · Epistemology · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Ethics in medical practice · Healthcare Policy and Management · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
Higher-order desires, risk attitudes and respect for autonomy
Autonomy requires more curiosity less deference to risk
Patients, doctors and risk attitudes
What about the reasonableness of patients’ risk attitudes? A challenge to Makins’ antipaternalistic account
Reconsidering risk attitudes
Rationality of irrationality
When uncertainty is a symptom
On the elusiveness of higher-order risk attitudes
Risk aversion and rational choice theory do not adequately capture complexities of medical decision-making
| Highly cited | No |
|---|