Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Clinicians’ criteria for fetal moral status

Viability and relationality, not sentience

Bibliographic Data

ID21514937
AuthorsLisa Campo-Engelstein (0000-0003-1800-9110, Galveston College, corresponding author), Elise Andaya (0000-0001-7621-7466, University at Albany, State University of New York)
Year2024
Volume50
Issue9
Pages634-639
Publication date2024-09-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/jme-2022-108392
PMID36347605
OpenAlexW4308577495
LanguageEN
References cited33

The antiabortion movement is increasingly using ostensibly scientific measurements such as ‘fetal heartbeat’ and ‘fetal pain’ to provide ‘objective’ evidence of the moral status of fetuses. However, there is little knowledge on how clinicians conceptualise and operationalise the moral status of fetuses. We interviewed obstetrician/gynaecologists and neonatologists on this topic since their practice regularly includes clinical management of entities of the same gestational age. Contrary to our expectations, there was consensus among clinicians about conceptions of moral status regardless of specialty. First, clinicians tended to take a gradualist approach to moral status during pregnancy as they developed and viewed viability, the ability to live outside of the uterus, as morally significant. Second, in contrast to ‘fetal pain’ laws and philosophical discussions about the ethical salience of sentience, the clinicians in our study did not consider the ability to feel pain as a morally relevant factor in moral status determinations. Third, during previability and perviability, clinicians viewed moral status as a personal value decision, which should be made by pregnant people and parents of neonates

Cognitive psychology · Epistemology · Sentience · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Life Before Birth

    Bonnie Steinbock•Life Before Birth•2011

  • Moral Status As a Matter of Degree?

    Open Access•David Degrazia•The Southern Journal of Philosophy•2008

  • Authoritative Knowledge and Its Construction

    Brigitte Jordan•Childbirth and Authoritative…•1997

  • A Problem of Self-Ownership for Reproductive Justice

    Open Access•Elizabeth Lanphier•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2021

  • It’s Complicated

    Open Access•K Lindsey Chambers•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2020

  • In search of the moral status of AI

    Open Access•Martin Gibert, Dominic Martins•AI & Society•2022

  • Abortion Bans Premised on Fetal Pain Capacity

    Open Access•Katie Wilson, Katie A Wilson•The Hastings Center Report•2012

  • Animal Liberation

    Peter Singer•Animal Rights•1973

  • Jurisprudence and Gender

    Robin West, Robin L West•The University of Chicago Law…•1988

  • Conflicting perceptions of the fetus

    Open Access•Clare Williams, Priscilla Alderson et al.•New Genetics and Society•2001

  • Creation Ethics

    Open Access•Elizabeth Harman•Philosophy & Public Affairs•1999

  • Conceptualizing Pain and Personhood in the Periviable Period

    Open Access•Elise Andaya, Lisa Campo-Engelstein•Social Science & Medicine•2021

  • New reproductive technologies, genetic counselling and the standing of the fetus

    Open Access•Y Hashiloni-Dolev, Yael Hashiloni‐dolev et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2008

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae