On the ethical permissibility of in situ reperfusion in cardiac transplantation after the declaration of circulatory death

Transplant surgeons in the USA have begun performing a novel organ procurement protocol in the setting of circulatory death. Unlike traditional donation after circulatory death (DCD) protocols, in situ normothermic perfusion DCD involves reperfusing organs, including the heart, while still contained in the donor body. Some commentators, including the American College of Physicians, have claimed that in situ reperfusion after circulatory death violates the widely accepted Dead Donor Rule (DDR) and conclude that in situ reperfusion is ethically impermissible. In this paper I argue that, in terms of respecting the DDR, in situ reperfusion cardiac transplantation does not differ from traditional DCD cardiac transplantation. I do this by introducing and defending a refined conception of circulatory death, namely vegetative state function permanentism . I also argue against the controversial brain occlusion feature of the in situ reperfusion DCD protocol, on the basis that it is ethically unnecessary and generates the problematic appearance of ethical dubiousness

Cardiology · Circulatory system · Donation · Heart transplantation · Organ procurement · Political science · Law · Medicine · Organ Donation and Transplantation · Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes · Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes · Internal Medicine · Transplantation

• DCDD Donors Are Not Dead

  Open Access•Ari Joffe, Ari R Joffe•The Hastings Center Report•2018

  Add to list

• A Defense of the Dead Donor Rule

  Open Access•David Magnus•The Hastings Center Report•2018

  Add to list