Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Future of global regulation of human genome editing

A South African perspective on the WHO Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing

Bibliographic Data

ID21515001
AuthorsBonginkosi Shozi (0000-0003-2994-0795, University of KwaZulu-Natal, corresponding author), Tamanda Kamwendo (0000-0002-5434-113X, University of KwaZulu-Natal), Julian Kinderlerer (0000-0003-0481-0441, University of KwaZulu-Natal), Donrich Thaldar (0000-0002-7346-3490, University of KwaZulu-Natal), Beverley Townsend (0000-0002-8486-6041, University of KwaZulu-Natal), Marietjie Botes (0000-0002-6613-6977, University of KwaZulu-Natal)
Year2022
Volume48
Issue3
Pages165-168
Publication date2022-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/medethics-2020-106863
PMID33762299
OpenAlexW3139227780
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited17

WHO in 2019 established the Advisory Committee on Developing Global Standards for Governance and Oversight of Human Genome Editing, which has recently published a Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing. Although the Draft Framework is a good point of departure, there are four areas of concern: first, it does not sufficiently address issues related to establishing safety and efficacy. Second, issues that are a source of tension between global standard setting and state sovereignty need to be addressed in a more nuanced fashion. Third, it fails to meaningfully engage with the extent to which the conceptualisation of human dignity may justifiably vary between jurisdictions. Fourth, the meaning of harm to the interests of a future person requires clarity. Provided these four areas of concern can be addressed, the future of the global governance of human genome editing may hold promise

Biology · Business · CLARITY · Corporate governance · Dignity · Genome · Genome editing · Harm · Human rights · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sovereignty · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research · Law · Genetics

  • An imbalanced approach to governance? An analysis of the WHO's position on human genome editing

    Open Access•Donrich Thaldar, Bonginkosi Shozi•Bioethics•2023

  • Global health and global governance of emerging biomedical technologies

    Bryan Cwik•Journal of Medical Ethics•2023

  • Human heritable genome editing and its governance

    Open Access•R Jean Cadigan, Margaret Waltz et al.•New Genetics and Society•2024

  • Global health ethics

    Open Access•Greg Stapleton, Peter Schröder‐Bäck et al.•Global Health Action•2014

  • A Difficult Legacy

    Open Access•Paweł Łuków•Human Rights Review•2018

  • Stem cell research, morality, and law

    Donrich W Jordaan, Donrich Jordaan•South African Journal on Human…•2017

  • Something old, something new

    Bonginkosi Shozi•South African Journal on Human…•2020

  • Human Dignity, Human Rights, and Human Genetics

    Open Access•Deryck Beyleveld, Roger Brownsword•Modern Law Review•1998

  • Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights

    Christopher Mccrudden•European Journal of International…•2008

Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae