Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Lockdown, public good and equality during Covid-19

Bibliographic Data

ID21515033
AuthorsLibby Frith (0000-0002-8506-0699, University of Liverpool, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume46
Issue11
Pages713-714
Publication date2020-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/medethics-2020-106964
PMID33115933
OpenAlexW3095632113
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited7

On 22nd September 2020 the UK Government announced new lockdown restrictions to supress the COVID-19 virus, with some areas of England having more restrictive lockdown guidance. Students in a number of cities have been confined to their halls of residences after outbreaks of COVID-19 and in Manchester security guards were preventing students leaving the buildings. The scientific community are, unsurprisingly, divided over the question of how far lockdowns should extend.1 Monday 21st September 2020 saw the publication of two open letter to the UK government and Chief Medical Officers. One group, Sunetra Gupta et al ,2 argued for a selective lockdown targeting the most vulnerable. The other, headed by Trisha Greenhalgh, arguing that attempts to suppress the virus should operate across the whole community.3 As we enter what appears to be a second wave of COVID-19 infections and accompanying lockdown measures, ethical debates over the appropriateness and extent of such measures are critical. Julian Savulescu and James Cameron4 in their article on lockdown of the elderly and why this is not ageist, put forward the case that, ‘an appropriate approach may be to lift the general lockdown but implement selective isolation of the elderly.’ Their central claim is that selective isolation of the elderly is to be preferred to imposing lockdown on all members of society. The aim of lockdown, restricting movement and key activities, is designed to reduce the number of deaths from COVID-19 and also to prevent the healthcare system from becoming overwhelmed. As the elderly are at significantly more risk of having severe cases of COVID-19 and therefore more likely to place demands on healthcare services, they are clearly prime candidates for lockdown measures, measures that will not only benefit them but the whole of society. This is not ageist as

2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Outbreak · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Computer Science · Employment and Welfare Studies · Global Health Care Issues · Healthcare Systems and Challenges · Law · Medicine · Virology

  • Impacts of the Pandemic, Animal Source Food Retailers’ and Consumers’ Knowledge and Attitudes toward Covid-19, and Their Food Safety Practices in Chiang Mai, Thailand

    Open Access•Chalita Jainonthee, Sinh Dang-Xuan et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Lockdown and levelling down

    Open Access•Jonathan A Hughes•Journal of Medical Ethics•2020

  • Ethical framework for adult social care in Covid-19

    Open Access•Charlotte Elves, Jonathan Herring•Journal of Medical Ethics•2020

  • Why lockdown of the elderly is not ageist and why levelling down equality is wrong

    Open Access•Julian Savulescu, James Cameron•Journal of Medical Ethics•2020

  • Covid-19 and justice

    Open Access•John Mcmillan•Journal of Medical Ethics•2020

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae