Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why Nipt should be publicly funded

Bibliographic Data

ID21515165
AuthorsEline M Bunnik (0000-0003-1481-6222, Erasmus MC, corresponding author), Adriana Kater‐Kuipers (0000-0001-8992-4928, Erasmus MC), Adriana Kater-Kuipers (Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands), Robert‐Jan H Galjaard (0000-0002-8101-6180, Erasmus MC), Robert-Jan H Galjaard (Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands), Inez de Beaufort (Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands)
Year2020
Volume46
Issue11
Pages783-784
Publication date2020-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/medethics-2020-106218
PMID32277019
OpenAlexW3015444815
LanguageEN
References cited9

Asking pregnant women to (co)pay for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) out of pocket leads to unequal access across socioeconomic strata. To avoid these social justice issues, first-trimester prenatal screening should be publicly funded in countries such as the Netherlands, with universal coverage healthcare systems that offer all other antenatal care services and screening programmes free of charge. In this reply, we offer three additional reasons for public funding of NIPT. First, NIPT may not primarily have medical utility for women and children, but rather offers relevant information and reproductive options, and thus serves important autonomy interests of women. Second, public funding of NIPT can be justified because it results in a reduction of collectively borne costs associated with care and support for children with chromosomal abnormalities. It is important to note that this is not an argument for individual women to take part in screening or to terminate an affected pregnancy. However, it is a legitimate argument in policy making regarding funding arrangements for screening programmes. Finally, public funding would help to amend current misunderstandings among pregnant women (eg, that they are not at risk), and thus to support informed consent for first-trimester prenatal screening

Alternative medicine · Autonomy · Economic Justice · Environmental health · Family medicine · Informed consent · Political science · Population · Pregnancy · Prenatal care · Prenatal diagnosis · Prenatal screening · Public health · Public relations · Socioeconomic status · Ethics in Clinical Research · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

  • Ethnicity and Language Proficiency Differences in the Provision of and Intention to Use Prenatal Screening for Down’s Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies. A Prospective, Non-selected, Register-Based Study in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Ingrid Peters, Ingrid A Peters et al.•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2017

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae