Stop the bleeding

When I was a 7 months pregnant medical student, an attending surgeon asked me to which specialty I would be applying. When I replied that I was hoping to match in general surgery, he touched my pregnant abdomen and said, “Not with that you’re not.” I am not alone. Gender bias and discrimination have been shown to negatively impact women surgeons throughout their careers and deter women from even applying in surgical fields.1 Bias against female surgical trainees leads to less operative autonomy and higher dropout rates.2 3 Once faculty, women surgeons are less likely to reach leadership roles.4 Recent studies confirm the author’s assertion that implicit biases create substantial harm. The author has undertaken an important study, conducting in-depth interviews with 46 women surgeons in Australia that identifies four distinct types of bias causing cumulative harm. In all four types of biases: (1) Workplace factors including leave policies and mentorship. (2) Epistemic injustices, or unfair assessments of women surgeons’ credibility by patients and colleagues. (3) Stereotyped expectations. (4) Objectification, implicit biases were seen. While many of the broad factors impeding women in surgery are well known, the author argues that these subtler factors, including both implicit bias and epistemic injustice, have a large impact. The

Computer Science · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Global Health Workforce Issues · Medical Education and Admissions · Medicine · Psychology

• Epistemic injustice in healthcare professional practice

  Open Access•Elizabeth Hornyak-Bell, Aliki Thomas et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  Add to list

• Epistemic Injustice and Illness

  Open Access•Ian James Kidd, Havi Carel•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2016

  Add to list