Is it ethically permissible for GPs to promote non-directed altruistic kidney donation to healthy adults
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21515313 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard C Armitage (0000-0003-1165-6753, University of Nottingham, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 339-345 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257 |
| Publisher | BMJ (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1136/jme-2023-109728 |
| PMID | 38538063 |
| OpenAlex | W4393219730 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 40 |
Doctors hold coexisting ethical duties to avoid causing deliberate harm to their patients (non-maleficence), to act in patients’ best interests (beneficence), to respect patients’ right to self-determination (autonomy) and to ensure that costs and benefits are fairly distributed among patients (justice). In the context of non-directed altruistic kidney donations (NDAKD), doctors’ duties of autonomy and justice are in tension with those of non-maleficence and beneficence. This article examines these competing duties across three scenarios in which general practitioners (GPs) could promote NDAKD to healthy adults. In the first—when a healthy adult patient prompts the GP to discuss NDAKD—the GP is ethically obligated to counsel the patient about NDAKD to respect their autonomy, yet this does not constitute any form of promotion of NDAKD. In the remaining scenarios, healthy adult patients are unaware of the possibility of NDAKD. In the second, it is ethically permissible for GPs to indirectly raise awareness of NDAKD among healthy adults by displaying recruitment campaign material to non-specified groups of patients in their waiting rooms. In the third, it is ethically impermissible for GPs to directly promote NDAKD to individual healthy adults by raising the possibility of NDAKD with such individuals. The major counterarguments raised against this position are problems with kinds of counselling that fail to reach expected professional standards, rather than problems with the ethical claims made in this article
Autonomy · Beneficence · Bioethics · Donation · Economic Justice · Harm · Organ donation · Political science · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Law · Medicine · Organ Donation and Transplantation · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Social Psychology · Surgery · Transplantation
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |