Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Shake it Off

Negotiations suspended, but hope simmering, after a lack of consensus at the fifth intergovernmental conference on biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction

Bibliographic Data

ID21519710
AuthorsRachel Tiller (0000-0002-2505-9194, SINTEF, corresponding author), Elizabeth Mendenhall (0000-0001-8006-6488, University of Rhode Island), Elizabeth M De Santo (0000-0003-0975-1874, Franklin & Marshall College), Elizabeth De Santo, Elizabeth Nyman (0000-0001-6622-5710, Texas A&M University at Galveston)
Year2023
Volume148
Pages105457
Publication date2023-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMarine Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105457
OpenAlexW4312156828
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited24

The process for formulating a new treaty for ‘Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction’ (BBNJ) has been long. Since informal discussions began in 2004, the international community has devoted nearly 20 years to setting the agenda, circumscribing the issue areas, and negotiating the terms of a legally binding BBNJ instrument. The fourth and fifth inter-governmental conferences (IGCs), which both occurred in 2022 after a two-year hiatus due to COVID-19, were supposed to be the last. But despite major movement, altered modalities, and three versions of the draft treaty texts circulated during IGC-5, another round of negotiations ended without consensus on a new agreement. This paper explores the relationships between the pace and content of the emerging treaty, on the one hand, and the dynamics of process, interests, power, and ideology, on the other. After an overview of the negotiation format and apparent progress, subsequent sections consider in turn the issue areas of marine genetic resources (MGRs), area-based management tools, including marine protected areas (ABMTs/MPAs), environmental impact assessments (EIAs), and capacity building and transfer of marine technology (CBTMT). Institutional arrangements and cross cutting issues are also highlighted as key areas where obstacles remain, but where there is simmering hope

Jurisdiction · Negotiation · Political science · Public relations · Treaty · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · International Environmental Law and Policies · International Maritime Law Issues · Law · Public Administration

  • Form follows function

    Open Access•Jianye Tang•Marine Policy•2024

  • The potential interactions between the BBNJ Agreement and RFMOs in the establishment of ABMTs

    Open Access•Haoyu Tian, Jianping Guo•Marine Policy•2025

  • The Agreement on Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction – Caribbean Community perspectives on interests, asks and outcomes

    Open Access•Kahlil Hassanali•Marine Policy•2023

  • The significance of the concept of a maritime community with a shared future in the international law-making process

    Open Access•Chuanliang Wang•Marine Policy•2023

  • Interplays between the BBNJ Agreement and the Antarctic Treaty System on the Southern Ocean bioprospecting

    Open Access•Jinpeng Wang, Xiaohan Sun•Marine Policy•2024

  • And so it begins – The adoption of the ‘Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction’ treaty

    Open Access•Rachel Tiller, Elizabeth Mendenhall•Marine Policy•2023

  • Applying environmental DNA approaches to inform marine biodiversity conservation

    Open Access•Nina Yang, Di Jin et al.•Marine Policy•2024

  • The ship has reached the shore

    Open Access•Elizabeth Mendenhall, Rachel Tiller et al.•Marine Policy•2023

  • The likely impact of the BBNJ Agreement on the architecture of ocean governance

    Open Access•Richard E Kim, Rakhyun E Kim•Marine Policy•2024

  • The Rule of Three

    Open Access•Emily Cowan, Rachel Tiller et al.•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2024

  • It takes two to tango

    Open Access•Emily Cowan, Karl Holmberg et al.•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2024

  • The conservation-extraction nexus in ocean Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction

    Open Access•Elizabeth Havice, Anna Zalik et al.•Journal of Agrarian Change•2025

  • Process-Tracing Methods

    Open Access•Derek Beach, Rasmus Brun Pedersen et al.•Process-Tracing Methods:…•2013

  • Not ‘undermining’ who? Unpacking the emerging BBNJ regime complex

    Open Access•Arne Langlet, Alice B M Vadrot•Marine Policy•2023

  • Stuck in the middle with you (and not much time left)

    Open Access•Elizabeth M De Santo, Elizabeth Mendenhall et al.•Marine Policy•2020

  • Adjacency and due regard

    Open Access•Joanna Mossop, Clive Schofield•Marine Policy•2020

  • Direction, not detail

    Open Access•Elizabeth Mendenhall, Elizabeth M De Santo et al.•Marine Policy•2022

  • Institutional arrangements for the new BBNJ agreement

    Open Access•Nichola A Clark, Nichola Clark•Marine Policy•2020

  • Ocean plastics and the BBNJ treaty—is plastic frightening enough to insert itself into the BBNJ treaty, or do we need to wait for a treaty of its own

    Open Access•Rachel Tiller, Elizabeth Nyman•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2018

  • Marine Biodiversity Negotiations During Covid-19

    Open Access•Alice B M Vadrot, Arne Langlet et al.•Global Environmental Politics•2021

  • Precautionary discourse

    Open Access•Nathan Dinneen•Politics and the Life Sciences•2013

  • Internationalization of EIA in a new marine biodiversity agreement under the Law of the Sea Convention

    Open Access•Kahlil Hassanali•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2021

Unique citing works12
Citations per year4
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae