Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Beyond the boundaries

How regulation-centered marine protected area information improves ocean protection assessments

Bibliographic Data

ID21519958
AuthorsJennifer Sletten (corresponding author), Mimi M D'Iorio (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), Mimi D'Iorio (0000-0002-4026-1390), MARY GLEASON (0000-0003-3347-4424, The Nature Conservancy), Mary G Gleason, Alex Driedger (0000-0003-2021-4324), Alexander G J Driedger, Timothé Vincent, Claire Colegrove (0000-0001-8177-2536), Dawn J Wright (0000-0002-2997-7611, Environmental Systems Research Institute (United States)), Dawn Wright, Virgil Zetterlind
Year2021
Volume124
Pages104340
Publication date2021-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMarine Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104340
OpenAlexW3111091150
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited31

Comprehensive, spatially explicit data that include regulatory information are essential for evaluating the level of protection that marine protected areas (MPAs) and other marine managed areas (MMAs) provide to marine life, and to inform progress towards ocean protection targets. An analysis based on the ProtectedSeas database, which includes information on regulated activities, found that 85% of U.S. waters are in managed areas that restrict living resource extraction at some level above generally applicable regulations, with 52% managed at a low level of protection and 3% managed as highly protected no-take areas. States with the most state waters area in no-take MPAs are Hawaii (~25%), California (~9%), and Oregon (~3%). The majority of highly protected areas in U.S. waters exist in low-populated areas of the Pacific, such as the Papahānaumokuākea and Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monuments. Under a quarter of U.S. waters are closed to bottom trawling, with the West Coast and Alaska each contributing one-third of trawl closures by area. Bottom trawling is prohibited in nearly 90% of West Coast waters. Focusing on waters off California showed that overlapping management and fishing gear restrictions can increase overall protection. In state waters, no-take MPAs account for roughly 9% of the area, while restricted take MPAs of different types cover 27% of the area. About 40% of California state waters are in some kind of MPA, while 13.4% of state waters have a high level of protection from fishing impacts. In federal waters off California, under one percent are in no-take areas while nearly all waters are subject to some kind of fishery restriction. Capturing regulatory information at the individual MPA and MMA level will improve assessments of current protection, inform planning of new protections, and provide ocean users a more accessible way to increase compliance through awareness

Bottom trawling · Commercial fishing · Environmental protection · Environmental resource management · Exclusive economic zone · Fishery · Fishing · Geography · Marine conservation · Marine life · Marine protected area · Marine reserve · Protected area · Trawling · Coastal and Marine Management · Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies · Environmental Science · Marine and fisheries research · Ecology · Geology · Oceanography

  • Ecosystem service bundles highlight priorities and trade-offs for marine spatial planning

    Open Access•Kara E Pellowe, Andrea De Cervo et al.•Ecosystems and People•2026

  • Over 80% of the European Union’s marine protected area only marginally regulates human activities

    Open Access•Juliette Aminian-Biquet, Sašo Gorjanc et al.•One Earth•2024

  • Preventing poaching in marine protected areas

    Open Access•Chi-Heng Tsai, Huey-Shian Elly Chung et al.•Marine Policy•2024

  • Government environmental regulation strategy for new pollutants control in mariculture

    Open Access•Lianghong Yu, Shan Zheng et al.•Marine Policy•2023

  • Use of conservation areas for fisheries management and ecosystem conservation in the U.S. exclusive economic zone

    Open Access•Michelle Bachman, Jessica Coakley et al.•Marine Policy•2025

  • Guidance on marine protected area protection level assignments when faced with unknown regulatory information

    Open Access•Alex Driedger, Jennifer Sletten et al.•Marine Policy•2023

  • Marine defaunation

    Open Access•Douglas J Mccauley, Malin L Pinsky et al.•Science•2015

Citations per year2
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae