Combining offshore wind farms, nature conservation and seafood
Lessons from a Dutch community of practice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21519982 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nathalie A Steins (0000-0002-6362-342X, Wageningen University & Research, corresponding author), J A Veraart (0000-0001-6463-2056, Wageningen University & Research), J E M Klostermann (0000-0002-4018-9907, Wageningen University & Research), M Poelman (0000-0002-0074-9586, Wageningen University & Research) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 126 |
| Pages | 104371 |
| Publication date | 2021-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Marine Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104371 |
| OpenAlex | W3127489951 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 27 |
Large-scale development of offshore wind farms implies an increase in marine resource use conflicts. Managing potential impacts on marine ecosystems and on resource access for traditional and prospective users is key. Multi-use scenarios are a solution but are often approached as a 'design question' that can be settled through Marine Spatial Planning. In practice, regulatory, technical and socio-economic factors often hinder multi-use. Overcoming such barriers requires active collaboration between all stakeholders, yet meaningful participation in MSP processes often is a challenge. This paper explores the role of Communities of Practice as a participatory tool for developing multi-use. The Netherlands set up a ‘Community of Practice North Sea’ to stimulate the development of multi-use pilots by bringing interested parties together, sharing experiences and learning from each other in a context of existing and developing spatial and social claims. This development is part of the government's strategy aimed at finding a balance between offshore wind energy development, nature conservation and seafood production. The paper shows that by (partly) decoupling policy from practice and creating a positive learning environment, Communities of Practice have potential as a participatory tool for encouraging cooperation between stakeholders in an informal setting and facilitating a transition towards multi-use of marine resources. The paper proposes ten guidelines for using Communities of Practices as an action-oriented tool for salient multi-use practices
Best practice · Business · Citizen journalism · Community of practice · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Marine conservation · Marine spatial planning · Offshore wind power · Political science · Sociology · Wind power · Coastal and Marine Management · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental Science · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Restoration
Overcoming the Challenge of Structural Change in Research Organisations – A Reflexive Approach to Gender Equality
Operationalizing marine multifunctionality in Europe
Advancing multi-use in offshore wind energy planning
Co-location of fisheries and offshore wind farms
Anglers' support for an offshore wind farm
Ocean economic and cultural benefit perceptions as stakeholders' constraints for supporting conservation policies
Marine nature-based solutions
Pathways to low carbon energy transition through multi criteria assessment of offshore wind energy barriers
Governing biodiversity through offshore wind park tenders
A systematic review of living lab literature
Exclusion and non-participation in Marine Spatial Planning
Change as a permanent condition
Ethnography and Participant Observation
Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems
Platforms for collective action in multiple-use common-pool resources
Collaborative learning
Science for the post-normal age
Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science
Why do Social Innovations in Rural Development Matter and Should They be Considered More Seriously in Rural Development Research? - Proposal for a Stronger Focus on Social Innovations in Rural Development Research
Blue growth
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |