Understanding the perceived conservation benefits of shark-marine tourism in the Global South

Bibliographic Data

ID21520105
AuthorsAliya C Siddiqi, Aliya Siddiqi (James Cook University, corresponding author), Brock J Bergseth (0000-0002-5486-175X, Australian Research Council), Amy Diedrich (0000-0003-2373-0471, James Cook University), Andrew Chin (0000-0003-1813-4042, James Cook University)
Year2024
Volume161
Pages105995
Publication date2024-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMarine Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105995
OpenAlexW4390735282
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited67

Shark and ray populations are declining due to the expansion of both target and non-target fisheries. Shark-marine tourism (SMT) has been advocated as a conservation approach to reduce pressure on shark populations by increasing their non-consumptive value and providing a potential livelihood option. However, diversification via tourism can create complex issues relating to the environment, policy, and local well-being. Additionally, little is known about the ecological or socio-economic effectiveness of shark-based marine tourism operations. This study explores how SMT programs may contribute to shark conservation by exploring practitioner perceptions of SMT and (a) its desired outcomes, success, and factors facilitating success; (b) how those outcomes were measured; (c) its effectiveness as a conservation tool; and (d) how alternative livelihoods or social engagement programs supported positive conservation gains. Semi-structured interviews (n = 15) were conducted with tourism operators and non-governmental organization (NGO) staff. NGOs measured success through population/impact studies or economic valuations of tourism, while operators cited conservation gains or skills training as success indicators. Project effectiveness was either unmeasured or inactively pursued due to insufficient capacity or resources. Tourism effectiveness is perceived to be highly dependent upon the local contexts and increases with active stakeholder engagement. Social and human capital enhancement was viewed as an important mechanism to increase tourism’s benefits beyond species protection. This study demonstrates that conservation requires a shift from a species-focus to one that engages effectively with those reliant on elasmobranch resources. Furthermore, it highlights the potential of SMT to generate innovative opportunities for improving elasmobranch conservation

Agriculture · Business · Economics · Ecotourism · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Fishery · Geography · Livelihood · Marine conservation · Natural resource economics · Political science · Population · Public relations · Social capital · Sociology · Stakeholder · Tourism · Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies · Ichthyology and Marine Biology · Marine animal studies overview · Marketing

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access