Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Adapting the Marine Stewardship Council risk-based framework to estimate impacts on seabirds, marine mammals, marine turtles and sea snakes

Bibliographic Data

ID21520293
AuthorsStephanie D Good, Stephanie Good (University of Exeter, corresponding author), Kate Dewar (Marine Stewardship Council), Polly Burns (0000-0003-0587-8421, Marine Stewardship Council), Keith Sainsbury (0000-0003-0649-3152, University of Tasmania), Richard A Phillips (0000-0002-0208-1444, British Antarctic Survey), Bryan P Wallace (0000-0001-9537-3501, University of Colorado Boulder), Caterina Fortuna, Caterina Maria Fortuna (0000-0003-3036-5337, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale), Vinay Udyawer (0000-0001-5812-0740, Australian Institute of Marine Science), Bruce Robson, Edward F Melvin (0000-0001-9166-6382, University of Washington), Rohan J C Currey (Marine Stewardship Council)
Year2024
Volume163
Pages106118
Publication date2024-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMarine Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106118
OpenAlexW4394734200
LanguageEN
References cited36

Information available on impacts of fisheries on target or bycatch species varies greatly, requiring development of risk assessment tools to determine potentially unacceptable levels. Seabirds, marine mammals, marine turtles and sea snakes are particularly vulnerable given their extreme life histories, and data are often lacking on their populations or bycatch rates with which to quantify fisheries impacts. The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) use a semi-quantitative Productivity Susceptibility Analysis (PSA) that is applicable to all species, target and non-target, to calculate risk of impact and to provide a score for relevant Performance Indicators for fisheries undertaking certification. The most recent MSC Fisheries Standard Review provided an opportunity to test the appropriateness of using this tool and whether it was sufficiently precautionary for seabirds, marine mammals and reptiles . The existing PSA was tested on a range of species and fisheries and reviewed in relation to literature on these species groups. New taxa-specific PSAs were produced and then reviewed by taxa-specific experts and other relevant stakeholders (e.g., assessors, fisheries managers, non-governmental conservation organizations). The conclusions of the Fishery Standard Review process were that the new taxa-specific PSAs were more appropriate than the existing PSA for assessing fisheries risk for seabirds, marine mammals and reptiles, and that, as intended, they resulted in precautionary outcomes. The taxa-specific PSAs provide useful tools for true data-deficient fisheries to assess relative risk of impact. Where some data are available, the MSC could consider developing or adapting other approaches to support robust and relevant risk assessments

Biology · Environmental resource management · Fishery · Geography · Habitat · Marine conservation · Marine protected area · Marine species · Political science · Environmental Science · Marine animal studies overview · Turtle Biology and Conservation · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses · Ecology

  • The MSC Fisheries Standard Review policy development process

    Open Access•Ernesto Jardim, Rohan J C Currey•Marine Policy•2023

  • Updating requirements for Endangered, Threatened and Protected species MSC Fisheries Standard v3.0 to operationalise best practices

    Open Access•Stephanie D Good, Stephanie Good et al.•Marine Policy•2024

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae