Progress in the implementation of marine ecosystem-based management - a literature review on successful stakeholder involvement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21520562 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kirsi Forss (0009-0005-4268-0029, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, corresponding author), Diana Giebels (0009-0005-9910-7223, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 191 |
| Pages | 107156 |
| Publication date | 2026-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Marine Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.marpol.2026.107156 |
| OpenAlex | W7161245836 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 93 |
This systematic review examines stakeholder involvement in marine ecosystem-based management (EBM) over the past 20 years, identifying progress and remaining gaps. We examined (1) Who are EBM stakeholders, which EBM phases involve them and through which institutional settings? (2) Which involvement methods are used, what knowledge is elicited and how is this knowledge incorporated into EBM? (3) How do stakeholders contribute to successful EBM implementation? (4) What types of social values are elicited from stakeholders and how are they used in EBM? A total of 102 peer‐reviewed articles were reviewed from an initial sample of 755. The results indicate that EBM remains predominantly top‐down initiated (48%), typically started by governmental agencies (25%). Research‐driven (34%) and bottom‐up (8%) approaches were less common. Governmental organisations formed the major stakeholder group (80%). Fisheries (51%) and tourism (10%) were the most represented sectors. Stakeholders were commonly involved in system description (58%), goal setting (55%), and strategy development (53%), but less often in monitoring and evaluation (34%). Long-term inclusion and adaptive management remained limited. 18 involvement methods were identified, with workshops (25%), surveys (24%), meetings (20%), interviews (20%), and consultations (19%) being the most common; participatory mapping (6%), participatory monitoring (3%), and negotiations (3%) were rare. Stakeholder knowledge focused mainly on the current state of ecosystems (75%), while direct input on measures and strategies (25%) was often limited to predefined categories rather than open feedback. 40% of studies explicitly demonstrated stakeholder involvement enhancing EBM success. Finally, social values are gaining prominence, particularly social cohesion (20%), cultural values (19%), and emotional connections (11%). • Review covers two decades of marine ecosystem-based management and stakeholder input. • Stakeholder involvement remains top-down regulated or tied to research projects. • Early-phase involvement is common; long-term inclusion and adaptive feedback rare. • 40% of the studies explicitly showed stakeholder involvement enhances EBM success. • 41% of the reviewed publications involved social values produced by stakeholder
Stakeholder · Stakeholder analysis · Stakeholder engagement · Stakeholder management · Coastal and Marine Management · Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Roses RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses
Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement
The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process
Key principles of marine ecosystem-based management
Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment
Evolution of co-management
Stakeholder participation for environmental management
Analysis of Gender Roles in Philippine Fishing Communities
Integrated governance for managing multidimensional problems
The implementation of ecosystem-based management in New Zealand – A Māori perspective
Engaging and legitimizing communities
Perceived need for management interventions in the Great Barrier Reef
‘Hooks’ and ‘Anchors’ for relational ecosystem-based marine management
Marine Plan Partnership for the North Pacific Coast
The Dutch fisheries sector and the North Sea Accord
Angler’s sense of place as an indicator for perceived vulnerability to shifting stock distributions
He waka eke noa/we are all in the same boat
Mapping place values
Literature syntheses to inform marine ecosystem management
Linking knowledge to action in ocean ecosystem management
Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation
Co-management and the co-production of knowledge
Social Landscape Metrics
Developing an analytical framework for assessing progress toward ecosystem-based management
Early assessments of marine governance transformations
| Highly cited | No |
|---|