Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Spatiotemporal and multispecies comparisons between a citizen science platform and recall surveys in recreational fisheries

Bibliographic Data

ID21521217
AuthorsCasper Gundelund (0000-0002-2555-403X, Technical University of Denmark, corresponding author), Paul Venturelli (0000-0002-7329-7517, Ball State University), Bruce W Hartill, Bruce Hartill (0000-0001-8469-3673), Kamela Hyder (0000-0003-1428-5679, University of East Anglia), Kieran Hyder, Hans Jakob Olesen (0000-0002-3829-584X, Technical University of Denmark), Christian Skov (0000-0002-8547-6520, Technical University of Denmark)
Year2023
Volume155
Pages105780
Publication date2023-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMarine Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105780
OpenAlexW4385657789
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited45

Smartphone applications for anglers that function as citizen science platforms are an alternative to the traditional survey methods that are used to collect data from recreational fisheries. Comparisons between these two methods are needed to understand the impacts of the biases associated with data generated from smartphone applications. However, such comparisons are uncommon, especially for multiple fisheries over time and across space. In this study, we compared catch and effort data from an electronic citizen science platform for anglers with an offsite web-based recall survey for consecutive (i) 3-month periods in a spatially distinct (i.e., the Danish island of Funen) sea trout (Salmo trutta) fishery (2017–2020), (ii) 6-month periods in coastal sea trout and coastal/offshore cod (Gadus morhua) fisheries across eight ICES management areas (2016–2020), and (iii) 6-month periods in a freshwater pike (Esox lucius) fishery (2016–2020). Catch and effort data from the two surveys were, in most cases, consistently similar over time for the Funen sea trout and Danish freshwater pike fisheries. In contrast, we found that the recall survey estimates were consistently 100–200% larger than the citizen science platform for both sea trout and cod in ICES areas. Our findings suggest that the applicability of electronic citizen science platforms for anglers can be fishery-specific, and that systematic bias may occur

Biology · Citizen science · Esox · Fish · Fisheries management · Fishery · Fishing · Geography · Pike · Recreation · Recreational fishing · Salmo · Trout · Fish Ecology and Management Studies · Marine and fisheries research · Species Distribution and Climate Change · Ecology

  • Beyond Asking the Right Questions

    Open Access•Samuel Blyth, Lotte Van Den Heuvel et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2025

  • Enhancing cost-effectiveness in marine recreational fishing assessment

    Open Access•Fabio Cevenini, Alice Bartolini et al.•Marine Policy•2025

  • Panama Canal expansion and shifts in fishing practices

    Open Access•Michelle Hübel, Gustavo A Castellanos‐Galindo et al.•People and Nature•2026

  • Changes in angler demography and angling patterns during the Covid-19 lockdown in spring 2020 measured through a citizen science platform

    Open Access•Casper Gundelund, Christian Skov•Marine Policy•2021

  • Benefits arising from sustainable use of North America’s fishery resources

    Bruce L Tufts, J Holden et al.•International Journal of…•2015

  • Assessing the relative importance of recall bias and nonresponse bias and adjusting for those biases in statewide angler surveys

    Nancy A Connelly, Tommy L Brown et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2000

  • Using Recreation Specialization to Understand Multi-Attribute Management PReferences

    Chi-Ok Oh, Chi‐ok Oh et al.•Leisure Sciences•2006

  • Recreation Specialization

    Robert B Ditton, David K Loomis et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•1992

  • Leisure Value Systems and Recreational Specialization

    Hobson Bryan•Journal of Leisure Research•1977

Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae