Towards holistic, participative and adaptable governance for offshore wind farm decommissioning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21521251 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lobke H Jurrius (Wageningen University & Research, corresponding author), Luc van Hoof (0000-0002-9152-9801, Wageningen University & Research) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 170 |
| Pages | 106413 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Marine Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106413 |
| OpenAlex | W4402969282 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 63 |
The earliest generation of offshore wind farms across Europe soon approach their end-of-life phase. Recent academic and societal attention has centred on the ‘artificial reef effects’ of offshore wind farms, triggering concerns regarding how to appropriately approach the decommissioning of the monopiles. Wind turbines and their foundations are jurisdictionally expected to be fully removed. Partial decommissioning, in which structures are left in place, is raised as a potential alternative that is anticipated to have ecological benefits over full decommissioning. Despite a strong growing scientific interest in OWF decommissioning, as well as an increasing public debate on the issue, a comprehensive approach to decommissioning decision-making has not yet landed in the actual regulatory processes. This gap is strikingly apparent in the Netherlands, where two OWFs will be decommissioned in the coming years. This paper explores where stakeholders believe the current bottlenecks exist, and how progress can be made towards decisive but inclusive decision-making. Based on individual co-creation sessions with concerned stakeholders, it offers multiple recommendations, including broadly supported criteria to be considered when comparing decommissioning alternatives, as well as underlying perceptions or patterns to be recognised, such as liability concerns, ecosystem valuation, lock-in and path dependency. The discussions and conclusions from this paper can be applied in all countries where decommissioning of OWFs is imminent, and thereby be used as a guide towards inclusive, adaptive and holistic governance within marine management
Business · Citizen journalism · Corporate governance · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Nuclear decommissioning · Offshore wind power · Political science · Submarine pipeline · Wind power · Engineering · Environmental Science · Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies · Finance · Geology · Oceanography
Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem
Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management
The Struggle to Govern the Commons
Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems
The hidden costs of multi-use at sea
Effects of offshore wind farms on marine wildlife—a generalized impact assessment
Linking ecosystem services with epibenthic biodiversity change following installation of offshore wind farms
Indirect Causes And Effects In Policy Change
Brent Spar, Atlantic Oil and Greenpeace
Transition Management for Sustainable Development
Explaining path-dependent rigidity traps
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |