Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Frameworks and best practices for cumulative impact accounting in offshore energy development

Bibliographic Data

ID21521332
AuthorsCaitlin D Kuempel (0000-0003-1609-9706, Griffith University, corresponding author), Jackson Stockbridge (Launceston General Hospital), Tess O’Neill, T del Santo O'Neill (0009-0004-4703-2680, University of Tasmania), Laura Griffiths (0000-0001-8701-4373, Launceston General Hospital), Laura L Griffiths, C L J Frid (0000-0002-7565-635X, Griffith University), Christopher J Brown (0000-0002-7271-4091, University of Tasmania)
Year2025
Volume173
Pages106571
Publication date2025-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMarine Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106571
OpenAlexW4405839032
LanguageEN
References cited49

Offshore renewable energy holds promise for achieving emission reduction targets. However, offshore industries transform land and seascapes with resultant trade-offs for both nature and people. Cumulative impacts have long been a challenging issue for environmental management, creating uncertainty around development limits across scales and risks to financial investments and the environment. This is particularly true for nascent industries and governments striving to meet tight deadlines for international commitments. Here, we provide recommendations for improved accounting of cumulative impacts for offshore development based on scientific best practice including: 1) clear pathways from activity to impact, 2) accounting for the full suite of cumulative impacts, 3) integration across realms and jurisdictions, 4) systematic planning processes to guide fair and equitable development opportunities within and across sectors, and 5) transparent and reproducible assessments. We demonstrate opportunities and challenges of implementing our recommendations using offshore wind project proposals in Australia, where the development of the offshore wind industry is in progress. Our recommendations outline key considerations for cumulative impact accounting in offshore energy development globally and can increase potential for positive outcomes for people and nature across these rapidly expanding sectors. • Available frameworks can improve cumulative impact accounting in offshore industries. • Structured impact-pathway frameworks can provide clear links from activity to impact. • Interdisciplinarity can improve integration across sectors, realms and jurisdictions. • Marine spatial planning can guide fair and equitable development opportunities. • Transparent and reproducible data science practices enable cumulative assessments

Business · Environmental resource management · Submarine pipeline · Coastal and Marine Management · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Environmental Science · Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies · Accounting · Geology · Oceanography

  • Net-zero emissions energy systems

    Open Access•Steven J Davis, Nathan S Lewis et al.•Science•2018

  • International progress in cumulative effects assessment

    Jill Blakley, Jessica Russell•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2022

  • Blueprint for Blue Economy implementation

    Open Access•Robert L Stephenson, Alistair J Hobday•Marine Policy•2024

  • A two way process – Social capacity as a driver and outcome of equitable marine spatial planning

    Open Access•Céline Jacob, Sereno Duprey Diederichsen et al.•Marine Policy•2023

  • A synthesis of approaches to support integrated assessments of hazards for the emerging Blue Economy

    Open Access•Mischa P Turschwell, Elizabeth A Fulton et al.•Marine Policy•2023

  • The performance of marine spatial planning in coordinating offshore wind energy with other sea-uses

    Open Access•Rozanne C Spijkerboer, Christian Zuidema et al.•Marine Policy•2020

  • A review of support tools to assess multi-sector interactions in the emerging offshore Blue Economy

    Open Access•MP Turschwell, MA Hayes et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2022

  • The Blue Acceleration

    Open Access•Jean‐baptiste Jouffray, Robert Blasiak et al.•One Earth•2020

  • Integrating Life Cycle and Impact Assessments to Map Food's Cumulative Environmental Footprint

    Open Access•Caitlin D Kuempel, Melanie Frazier et al.•One Earth•2020

  • The environmental footprint of global food production

    Open Access•Benjamin S Halpern, Melanie Frazier et al.•Nature Sustainability•2022

  • An effective set of principles for practical implementation of marine cumulative effects assessment

    Open Access•Adrian Judd, A D Judd et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2015

  • A risk-based method to prioritize cumulative impacts assessment on marine biodiversity and research policy for offshore wind farms in France

    Open Access•Jean-Marc Brignon, Morgane Lejart et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2021

  • Co-designing a multi-criteria approach to ranking hazards to and from Australia’s emerging offshore blue economy

    Open Access•Mischa P Turschwell, Christopher J Brown et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2023

  • Assessing cumulative impacts within state environmental review frameworks in the United States

    Open Access•Zhao Ma, Dennis R Becker et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2009

  • Establishing the Resilience of a Coastal-marine Social-ecological System to the Installation of Offshore Wind Farms

    Open Access•Benjamin Burkhard, Kira Gee•Conservation Ecology•2012

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae