Evaluating fisheries’ governance effectiveness in supporting ecosystem-based management
A Q-methodology assessment of stakeholder perspectives in Greek waters
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21521652 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dimitra Syrou (0000-0002-2162-6614, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, corresponding author), Angelos Liontakis (0000-0002-4482-738X, Agricultural University of Athens), Iosif Botetzagias (University of the Aegean), Vassiliki Vassilopoulou (0000-0003-2714-7945, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 192 |
| Pages | 107179 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Marine Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.marpol.2026.107179 |
| OpenAlex | W7162519174 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 50 |
This study investigates stakeholder perceptions of fisheries governance in the Patraikos Gulf, a key fishing ground in the eastern Ionian Sea, with a focus on the management of hake ( Merluccius merluccius ), a species of high commercial importance in one of the region’s main nursery areas. Using Q methodology, we engaged stakeholders across multiple governance levels, including national, regional, and local decision-makers, trawl and small-scale fishers, and scientists. The analysis identified three distinct stakeholder discourses (Factors A, B, and C), alongside areas of consensus, providing insight into governance dynamics within this socio-ecological system. Findings reveal both divergence and convergence in stakeholder perspectives. While views differ on specific management measures, stakeholders share concerns regarding limited coordination, low trust between authorities and local actors, and insufficient inclusion in decision-making processes. Situating the case within the broader Mediterranean policy context, where ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) is widely promoted, the study examines how stakeholders perceive the capacity of existing governance systems to operationalize its principles in practice. The results indicate that governance challenges observed in the Patraikos Gulf, including fragmented authority, legitimacy deficits, and limited participation, reflect broader structural patterns in the region. They also suggest that governance approaches perceived as adaptive, transparent, and responsive to local socio-ecological conditions may help improve alignment between policy frameworks and implementation. In this context, fine-grained governance, i.e., governance approaches that account for spatial and social heterogeneity by tailoring measures to local ecological conditions and stakeholder contexts, is identified as a potential direction for strengthening fisheries governance
Corporate governance · Stakeholder · Stakeholder engagement · Stakeholder Theory · Coastal and Marine Management · Marine and fisheries research · Q Methodology Applications
Centralization under decentralization
Public perceptions of the marine environment and behavioral intentions to preserve it
Small-scale fisheries access to fishing opportunities in the European Union
The quality of fisheries governance assessed using a participatory, multi-criteria framework
Perceptions of deforestation in the Argentinean Chaco
Using Q-methodology in environmental sustainability research
Discourses on Public Participation in Protected Areas Governance
Establishing a governance threshold in small-scale fisheries to achieve sustainability
Fisheries regulatory regimes and resilience to climate change
Sharing goals by timely communication improves fishermen's satisfaction with marine protected areas
Fisheries policy, research and the social sciences in Europe
Community knowledge as a cornerstone for fisheries management
Evolving adaptive governance
What does stakeholder involvement mean for fisheries management
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |