Working time limits at sea, a hundred-year construction
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21521696 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Raphaël Baumler (0000-0003-3786-8914, World Maritime University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 121 |
| Páginas | 104101 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Marine Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104101 |
| PMID | 32836697 |
| OpenAlex | W3051725292 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 8 |
| Referencias citadas | 36 |
In a view to protect workers from extended work periods as well as to comply with the Versailles Peace Treaty requirements, the International Labour Organization (ILO) regulated hours of work from 1919 using '8-hour workday and 48-h workweek' as yardsticks. However, a historical perspective demonstrates the ILO's difficulties in integrating such standards for sea workers. From 1920 to 1958, the ILO endeavoured to anchor the 8-hour workday principle in maritime conventions on working time and to ensure compliance by quantifying manning levels. Facing sectoral opposition and the obstacle of the minimum tonnage requirement, none of the conventions adopted during the first period entered into force. A second regulatory wave (1995-2007) initiated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) orientated working time towards fatigue management and adopted the 14-hour workday. Absorbed by the ILO from 1996, this threshold facilitated the implementation of working time standards for sea workers. The existence of autonomous maritime governance at the ILO and the IMO complemented by the incorporation of the tonnage clause in maritime convention allowed the acceptance of the 14-hour workday system in spite of breaching the universal principles established a century ago. The departure between maritime and land standards show that sectoral interests prevail over labour rights. More decisively, current standards detached labour rights from workers' human nature and attached them directly to sectoral interests
Business · Convention · Economics · Labour economics · Obstacle · Political science · Politics · Tonnage · Treaty · Working hours · Engineering · International Labor and Employment Law · Law · Occupational Health and Safety Management · Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Covid-19 Crisis – Lasting Effects on Seafarers’ Well-Being and Its Potential Impact on Retention
I Constantly Feel Worn Out ”
Quantification of influence and interest at IMO in Maritime Safety and Human Element matters
Can a ship be its own captain? Safe manning of autonomous and uncrewed vessels
Covid-19 border closures cause humanitarian crew change crisis at sea
Seafarers vs. Port State Control
Context matters
Covid-19 at sea
National Sleep Foundation’s sleep time duration recommendations
Fishers and Plunderers
Fatigue Risk Management
The International Labour Organization, 1919–2019
Implications of maritime globalization for the crews of merchant ships
The Common Seaman in the Histories of Capitalism and the Working Class
The Disciplining of German Seamen
The role of shipping in the ‘second stage of globalisation’
Precarious and hazardous work
Engineering Social Peace
Militancy and Inter-Union Rivalries in British Shipping, 1911–1929
The International Trade-Union Movement and the Founding of the International Labour Organization
Sovereignty for Sale
Young men and the sea
The Quest for Leisure
Les Trois Huits
Race, nationality and employment among Lascar seamen, 1660 to 1945
History and Heritage
Beyond eight hours rest
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,6 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |