Regulatory and legal frameworks recommendations for short sea shipping maritime autonomous surface ships
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21521847 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yaseen Adnan Ahmed (0000-0002-2324-2075, University of Strathclyde, corresponding author), Gerasimos Theotokatos, Γεράσιμος Θεοτοκάτος (0000-0003-3547-8867, University of Strathclyde), Ilia Maslov (0000-0003-0344-4718, Bureau Veritas (France)), Lars Andreas Lien Wennersberg (0000-0002-4090-3699, SINTEF), Dag Atle Nesheim (0000-0003-2224-7517, SINTEF) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 166 |
| Pages | 106226 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Marine Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106226 |
| OpenAlex | W4399424073 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 9 |
This study aims to provide recommendations for addressing the gaps in the existing regulatory and legal frameworks , including the international and national regulations, rules, and standards for developing Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASSs) for the Short Sea Shipping (SSS). T he methodological approach consists of the following steps: analysing the characteristics of case-specific MASS and its operating areas for SSS; thoroughly reviewing the existing regulatory and legal frameworks to identify gaps; classifying the gaps based on severity levels (high, moderate, or low); assessing the outlook and usage of potential Key Enabling Technologies (KETs), and offering recommendations through four alternative approaches - interpretation, amendment, new development, or maintaining existing ones. This study deals with MASSs of various Autonomy Levels (ALs), retaining human involvement via consideration of Remote Control Centre (RCC). The obtained results for the use case demonstrate that 62%, 12%, 6% and 5% of the identified gaps pertain to SOLAS , COLREG, STCW and ICLL conventions, respectively. Moreover, 10%, 55%, and 26% of the gaps are categorised as high, moderate, and low severity, with 9% of the gaps addressable through proper justification without requiring amendments. Many of the moderately severe gaps can be mitigated by considering the use of KETs; highly severe gaps necessitate exemptions or bilateral/multilateral agreements, whereas low severity gaps require clarification or definitions amendments. This study provides insights to policymakers for systematically amending the frameworks and preparing the MASS code required for the design, testing and operation of the MASSs for SSS
Business · International trade · Marine engineering · Maritime industry · Engineering · Maritime Navigation and Safety · Maritime Ports and Logistics · Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency · Geology · Oceanography
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |