Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Hazard and catch composition of ghost fishing gear revealed by a citizen science clean-up initiative

Bibliographic Data

ID21521898
AuthorsSusanna Huneide Thorbjørnsen (0000-0001-7589-2339, University of Agder, corresponding author), Ann-Elin Wårøy Synnes, Ann‐Elin Wårøy Synnes (0000-0002-1974-4945, Norwegian Institute of Marine Research), Ingrid Disch Løset (Norwegian University of Life Sciences), Alf Ring Kleiven (0000-0002-9330-8340, Norwegian Institute of Marine Research)
Year2023
Volume148
Pages105431
Publication date2023-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMarine Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105431
OpenAlexW4312109354
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited45

Ghost fishing, the continued catch of fishes and invertebrates by lost fishing gear, represents an animal welfare issue as well as a waste of both potential food and ecosystem resources. Fishing gear is lost by both commercial and recreational fishers, and management authorities often lack an overview of gear loss and subsequently potential impact on coastal populations. To investigate the hazard and catch composition of lost fishing gear along the Norwegian coast, recreational divers in collaboration with scientists conducted systematic reporting of retrieved lost fishing gear. Through this citizen science project, a total of 12,101 gear items were retrieved and reported, including traps, gillnets and fyke nets. Combining both data on the catch ratio of the gear and its relative quantity, we identified the five most hazardous gear types to be parlor traps, gillnets, fyke nets, wrasse traps and square collapsible traps. The parlour trap was the most hazardous trap, due to high catchability and quantity. The correct classification of gear type could not be confirmed in 2.8 – 6.1% of the pictures taken by divers, depending on reporting format, and divers reported the wrong gear type in 1.4% of the reports. Brown crab (Cancer pagurus) was the species most often found in retrieved gear. Furthermore, the vulnerable species European lobster (Homarus gammarus) and Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) were also common. These results can inform future clean up-initiatives and management responses to ghost fishing, including preventive measures against gear loss and gear restrictions and customization

Biology · Business · Fish · Fishery · Fishing · Gadus · Recreational fishing · Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies · Environmental Science · Fish Ecology and Management Studies · Marine and fisheries research

  • The extent of destructive fishing gear use in Bangladesh

    Open Access•Md Mehedi Alam, Md Saifullah Bin Aziz et al.•Marine Policy•2025

  • Introduction to the Marine Policy special issue on abandoned, lost and discarded fishing gear

    Open Access•Eric L Gilman, Kyle Antonelis et al.•Marine Policy•2023

  • Challenges for local fisheries in the blue economy –fishers’ perceptions

    Open Access•Stine Engen, Jannike Falk-Andersson et al.•Marine Policy•2026

  • Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic

    Open Access•Laurent Lebreton, Boyan Slat et al.•Scientific Reports•2018

  • Assessing data quality in citizen science

    Open Access•Margaret Kosmala, Andrea Wiggins et al.•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2016

  • Human-machine-learning integration and task allocation in citizen science

    Open Access•Marisa Ponti, Alena Seredko•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2022

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae