Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Controversy over beach access restrictions at an urban coastal seal rookery

Exploring the drivers of conflict escalation and endurance at Children’s Pool Beach in La Jolla, CA

Bibliographic Data

ID21521933
AuthorsLeilani Konrad (San Diego State University, corresponding author), Arielle Levine (0000-0002-8110-3049, San Diego State University)
Year2021
Volume132
Pages104659
Publication date2021-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMarine Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104659
OpenAlexW3185576605
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited15

Coastal urbanization and the recovery of many marine species has caused human interactions with marine wildlife to become more common, sometimes resulting in conflict. In La Jolla, CA, the increasing presence of Pacific harbor seals at Children’s Pool Beach (CPB) resulted in a 25 year conflict over appropriate beach use. Drawing on archival analysis, stakeholder interviews, and beach-goer surveys, we present a history of the conflict and explore the drivers that have enabled the conflict’s escalation and endurance. Many factors influence people’s polarized views about seals at CPB, including personal values and sense of identity, differing perceptions of what is “natural” at CPB, the threat of change and loss of beach access, and underlying inter-personal conflict. Politicization and inaction during the early stages of the conflict also precluded conflict resolution and contributed the conflict’s escalation. While overt conflict has decreased in recent years, polarized views about seals at CPB and legal challenges continue. In order to prevent conflict escalation and persistence, it is important that coastal managers work to address conflict over marine wildlife early and decisively. We present suggestions regarding minimally controversial management measures that could be undertaken early in a conflict, and suggest that managers prioritize commonly held values to facilitate stakeholder dialogue. While it may not be possible to generate solutions that appeal to all stakeholders, understanding the values and cultural frameworks driving conflict is an important first step toward understanding and generating workable solutions to conflict over wildlife

Conflict management · Conflict resolution · Conflict resolution research · Environmental ethics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Human–wildlife conflict · Political science · Public relations · Stakeholder · Wildlife · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Marine animal studies overview · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology

  • Conflicts in mangrove protected areas through the actor-centred power framework - Insights from China

    Open Access•Weiye Wang, Daye Zhai et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2023

  • Fight or Flight? Understanding Different Stakeholder Responses to Conservation Conflicts

    Open Access•Isla D Hodgson, A Fischer et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2022

  • Maritime controversies

    Open Access•Nicolas Benvegnu, Hélène Desfontaines et al.•Revue d'Anthropologie des…•2022

  • Controverses maritimes

    Open Access•Nicolas Benvegnu, Hélène Desfontaines et al.•Revue d'Anthropologie des…•2022

  • Controversias marítimas

    Open Access•Nicolas Benvegnu, Hélène Desfontaines et al.•Revue d'Anthropologie des…•2022

  • Mad about Wildlife

    Ann Herda-Rapp, Theresa Goedeke•Mad about Wildlife•2005

  • Values, Beliefs, and Proenvironmental Action

    Open Access•Paul C Stern, Linda Kalof et al.•Journal of Applied Social…•1995

  • Complexities of conflict

    Open Access•Amy Dickman, A J Dickman•Animal Conservation•2010

  • Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation

    Open Access•Nathan J Bennett, Rainer Roth et al.•Conservation Biology•2017

  • Conservation’s blind spot

    Open Access•Francine Madden, Brian Mcquinn•Biological Conservation•2014

  • Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict

    Open Access•M Nils Peterson, Jessie L Birckhead et al.•Conservation Letters•2010

  • Wildlife value orientations

    David C Fulton, Michael J Manfredo et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•1996

  • Creating Coexistence between Humans and Wildlife

    Francine Madden•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2004

  • Beyond naturalness

    Open Access•John Freemuth•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2011

  • A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data

    Open Access•Donald R Thomas, David R Thomas•American Journal of Evaluation•2006

Citations per year1.25
Citation span2022 - 2023 (2)
Highly citedNo
Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae