Controversy over beach access restrictions at an urban coastal seal rookery
Exploring the drivers of conflict escalation and endurance at Children’s Pool Beach in La Jolla, CA
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21521933 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leilani Konrad (San Diego State University, corresponding author), Arielle Levine (0000-0002-8110-3049, San Diego State University) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 132 |
| Pages | 104659 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Marine Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104659 |
| OpenAlex | W3185576605 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 15 |
Coastal urbanization and the recovery of many marine species has caused human interactions with marine wildlife to become more common, sometimes resulting in conflict. In La Jolla, CA, the increasing presence of Pacific harbor seals at Children’s Pool Beach (CPB) resulted in a 25 year conflict over appropriate beach use. Drawing on archival analysis, stakeholder interviews, and beach-goer surveys, we present a history of the conflict and explore the drivers that have enabled the conflict’s escalation and endurance. Many factors influence people’s polarized views about seals at CPB, including personal values and sense of identity, differing perceptions of what is “natural” at CPB, the threat of change and loss of beach access, and underlying inter-personal conflict. Politicization and inaction during the early stages of the conflict also precluded conflict resolution and contributed the conflict’s escalation. While overt conflict has decreased in recent years, polarized views about seals at CPB and legal challenges continue. In order to prevent conflict escalation and persistence, it is important that coastal managers work to address conflict over marine wildlife early and decisively. We present suggestions regarding minimally controversial management measures that could be undertaken early in a conflict, and suggest that managers prioritize commonly held values to facilitate stakeholder dialogue. While it may not be possible to generate solutions that appeal to all stakeholders, understanding the values and cultural frameworks driving conflict is an important first step toward understanding and generating workable solutions to conflict over wildlife
Conflict management · Conflict resolution · Conflict resolution research · Environmental ethics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Human–wildlife conflict · Political science · Public relations · Stakeholder · Wildlife · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Marine animal studies overview · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology
Mad about Wildlife
Values, Beliefs, and Proenvironmental Action
Complexities of conflict
Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation
Conservation’s blind spot
Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict
Wildlife value orientations
Creating Coexistence between Humans and Wildlife
Beyond naturalness
A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data
| Citations per year | 1.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2023 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |