Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Doing marine spatial zoning in coastal marine tropics

Palawan’s Environmental Critical Areas Network (Ecan)

Bibliographic Data

ID21522029
AuthorsKaren Madarcos (0000-0001-8016-9401, Western Philippines University), M Fortnam (0000-0002-6440-9214, University of Exeter, corresponding author), L Gajardo (Western Philippines University), Tomas Chaigneau (0000-0002-0874-216X, University of Exeter), RJ Manucan (Western Philippines University), Glenda M Cadigal (0000-0002-3723-7293, Palawan State University), G Cadigal, J Matulac (Palawan State University), Lota Creencia (0000-0002-8586-8604, Western Philippines University), B Gonzales, Benjamin J Gonzales (0000-0001-5488-0558, Western Philippines University), Louisa Evans (0000-0003-0816-8572, University of Exeter)
Year2022
Volume145
Pages105207
Publication date2022-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMarine Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105207
OpenAlexW4294080572
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited34

Zoning is an important tool in marine spatial planning (MSP) for balancing the multi-uses of the marine environment. Whilst mainly developed conceptually and implemented in Europe and North America, marine zoning is becoming a popular tool for addressing diverse coastal marine issues in the tropics. However, we know little about how it is being implemented in practice in that context. In this study, we analysed the factors and strategies that enable and hinder the establishment of marine zoning in the low-income tropics through a case study of the 26-year history of the development of the Environmental Critical Areas Network (ECAN) in Palawan, Philippines. We employed two participatory methods: Innovation Histories to investigate how implementation barriers and opportunities change over time, and the Net-Map method to reveal the social relations and power distributions that enabled, blocked, and stalled its implementation. We found that MSP can be durable in these contexts when institutionalised in national law and adopted by local co-coordinative bodies, yet it remains an externally-driven agenda. Our study shows that the scaling up of zoning does not necessarily help resolve conflicts around marine and coastal space, and highlights the importance and influence of the political economy on MSP implementation and outcomes. We conclude that MSP’s insensitivity to contextual power relations and politics raises concerns over social inclusivity, equity and justice. Moving forward, MSP implemented in the tropics needs to make conflicts, trade-offs and power distributions explicit at the outset through participatory decision-making that involves and empowers all stakeholders from the early stages of initiatives

Citizen journalism · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Fishery · Geography · Marine spatial planning · Political science · Politics · Tropics · Zoning · Coastal and Marine Management · Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies · International Maritime Law Issues · Law

  • Polycentricity in practice

    Open Access•M Fortnam, Louisa Evans et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2022

  • IUU fishing in the value chains of live grouper and squid exports

    Open Access•Dane Erlo Matorres, M Fabinyi et al.•Marine Policy•2025

  • Contributions of Net-Map to sustainability action research

    Open Access•Sofía Valeria Cortés-Calderón, María D López‐Rodríguez et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2025

  • Enhancing expert elicitation techniques through participatory mapping

    Open Access•Billy Tusker Haworth, Eleanor Bruce et al.•Geo Geography and Environment•2025

  • Marine spatial planning in reality

    Open Access•PETER J S JONES, Louise M Lieberknecht et al.•Marine Policy•2016

  • Ocean grabbing

    Open Access•Nathan J Bennett, Hugh Govan et al.•Marine Policy•2015

  • Mind the gap

    Open Access•Tundi Agardy, Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara et al.•Marine Policy•2011

  • The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process

    Open Access•Robert Pomeroy, Robert S Pomeroy et al.•Marine Policy•2008

  • Exclusion and non-participation in Marine Spatial Planning

    Open Access•Wesley Flannery, Noel Healy et al.•Marine Policy•2018

  • The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management

    Open Access•Fanny Douvere•Marine Policy•2008

  • Blue growth and blue justice

    Open Access•Nathan J Bennett, Jessica Blythe et al.•Marine Policy•2021

  • Major challenges in developing marine spatial planning

    Open Access•Catarina Frazão Santos, Tundi Agardy et al.•Marine Policy•2021

  • Taking power to sea

    Open Access•Ralph Tafon•Environment and Planning C…•2017

  • Marine spatial planning

    Open Access•Kjell Grip, Sven Blomqvist•AMBIO•2021

  • No-take Marine Reserves and Reef Fisheries Management in the Philippines

    Angel C Alcala, Garry R Russ•AMBIO•2006

  • Marine Spatial Planning in Asia and the Caribbean

    Open Access•Robert S Pomeroy, Kimberly Baldwin et al.•Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente•2014

  • Forces opposing sustainability transformations

    Open Access•M Fortnam, Matt P Fortnam•Conservation Ecology•2019

  • Remaking Oceans Governance

    Open Access•Luke Fairbanks, Noëlle Boucquey et al.•Environment and Society•2019

  • Net-Map

    Open Access•Eva Schiffer, Jennifer Hauck•CAM•2010

Citations per year1
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae