Auditory selective attention under working memory load
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21533078 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rena Bayramova (0000-0002-1562-7573, University of Padua), Enrico Toffalini (0000-0002-1404-5133, University of Padua), Mario Bonato (0000-0002-2004-9341, University of Padua, corresponding author), Massimo Grassi (0000-0002-3784-2784, University of Padua) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 2667-2681 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0340-0727 • E-ISSN: 1430-2772 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00426-020-01437-7 |
| PMID | 33146781 |
| OpenAlex | W3096303097 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 69 |
Can cognitive load enhance concentration on task-relevant information and help filter out distractors? Most of the prior research in the area of selective attention has focused on visual attention or cross-modal distraction and has yielded controversial results. Here, we studied whether working memory load can facilitate selective attention when both target and distractor stimuli are auditory. We used a letter n -back task with four levels of working memory load and two levels of distraction: congruent and incongruent distractors. This combination of updating and inhibition tasks allowed us to manipulate working memory load within the selective attention task. Participants sat in front of three loudspeakers and were asked to attend to the letter presented from the central loudspeaker while ignoring that presented from the flanking ones (spoken by a different person), which could be the same letter as the central one (congruent) or a different (incongruent) letter. Their task was to respond whether or not the central letter matched the letter presented n (0, 1, 2, or 3) trials back. Distraction was measured in terms of the difference in reaction time and accuracy on trials with incongruent versus congruent flankers. We found reduced interference from incongruent flankers in 2- and 3-back conditions compared to 0- and 1-back conditions, whereby higher working memory load almost negated the effect of incongruent flankers. These results suggest that high load on verbal working memory can facilitate inhibition of distractors in the auditory domain rather than make it more difficult as sometimes claimed
Audiology · Cognition · Cognitive Load · Cognitive psychology · Distraction · Selective attention · Working memory · EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neuroscience · Personal Information Management and User Behavior · Psychology
Statistical Rethinking
For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When
Working-memory capacity and the control of attention
Distracted and confused?
The Generality of Working Memory Capacity
Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task
Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors
The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions
Bayes factor design analysis
For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When, Varies Across Laboratory and Daily-Life Settings
The Relations Among Inhibition and Interference Control Functions
Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control.
AIC model selection using Akaike weights
AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology
What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it?
A new look at the statistical model identification
BRMS
Executive Functions
Cognitive load reduces interference by head fakes in basketball
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |