Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Labor division in collaborative visual search

A review

Bibliographic Data

ID21533391
AuthorsBasil Wahn (0000-0002-0318-7160, Universität Hamburg, corresponding author), Laura Schmitz (0000-0002-1216-4155, Universität Hamburg)
Year2023
Volume87
Issue5
Pages1323-1333
Publication date2023-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0340-0727 • E-ISSN: 1430-2772
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s00426-022-01767-8
PMID36378344
OpenAlexW4309093790
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited49

When looking for a certain object or person, individuals often engage in collaborative visual search, i.e., they search together by coordinating their behavior. For instance, when parents are looking for their child on a busy playground, they might search collaboratively by dividing the search area. This type of labor division in collaborative visual search could be beneficial not only in daily life, but also in professional life (e.g., at airport security screening, lifeguarding, or diagnostic radiology). To better understand the mechanisms underlying this type of collaborative behavior, as well as its benefits and costs, researchers have studied visual search scenarios in the laboratory. The aim of this review article is to provide a brief overview of the results of these studies. Are individuals faster if they search together compared to alone? And if so, should they simply search in parallel, or will they benefit from agreeing on a specific labor division? How should they divide the search space, and how to communicate this division? Should a consensus be reached (target present or absent?) before ending the search? We address these and further key questions, focusing on the aspect of labor division. In conclusion, we integrate the reviewed findings into an applied context, point out which questions still remain, and put forward suggestions for future research. We hope that this review can serve not only as a theoretical foundation for basic research but also as a practical inspiration for applied research and development

Cognitive psychology · Data science · Division of labour · Geography · Political science · Visual Search · Computer Science · Multisensory perception and integration · Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies · Psychology · Visual Attention and Saliency Detection · Artificial Intelligence

  • Humans do not “play fair” with social robots

    Open Access•Basil Wahn, Khadija Bawari et al.•Acta Psychologica•2026

  • Optimally Interacting Minds

    Open Access•Bahador Bahrami, Karsten Olsen et al.•Science•2010

  • Pupillometry

    Open Access•Sebastiaan Mathôt•Journal of Cognition•2018

  • Coordination effort in joint action is reflected in pupil size

    Open Access•Basil Wahn, Veera Ruuskanen et al.•Acta Psychologica•2021

  • Does interaction matter? Testing whether a confidence heuristic can replace interaction in collective decision-making

    Open Access•Dan Bang, Riccardo Fusaroli et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2014

  • Five factors that guide attention in visual search

    Open Access•Jeremy M Wolfe, Todd S Horowitz•Nature Human Behaviour•2017

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae