Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Digital pen technology for conducting cognitive assessments

A cross-over study with older adults

Bibliographic Data

ID21533502
AuthorsAnika Steinert (0000-0001-8025-266X, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, corresponding author), Antje Latendorf (0000-0003-1231-0981, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin), Alexander Prange (German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence), Daniel Sonntag (0000-0002-8857-8709, German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence), Ursula Müller‐Werdan (0000-0003-4440-8991, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin), U Müller-Werdan
Year2021
Volume85
Issue8
Pages3075-3083
Publication date2021-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0340-0727 • E-ISSN: 1430-2772
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s00426-020-01452-8
PMID33331957
OpenAlexW3112880672
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited18

Many digitalized cognitive assessments exist to increase reliability, standardization, and objectivity. Particularly in older adults, the performance of digitized cognitive assessments can lead to poorer test results if they are unfamiliar with the computer, mouse, keyboard, or touch screen. In a cross-over design study, 40 older adults (age M = 74.4 ± 4.1 years) conducted the Trail Making Test A and B with a digital pen (digital pen tests, DPT) and a regular pencil (pencil tests, PT) to identify differences in performance. Furthermore, the tests conducted with a digital pen were analyzed manually (manual results, MR) and electronically (electronic results, ER) by an automized system algorithm to determine the possibilities of digital pen evaluation. ICC(2,k) showed a good level of agreement for TMT A (ICC(2,k) = 0.668) and TMT B (ICC(2,k) = 0.734) between PT and DPT. When comparing MR and ER, ICC(2,k) showed an excellent level of agreement in TMT A (ICC(2,k) = 0.999) and TMT B (ICC(2,k) = 0.994). The frequency of pen lifting correlates significantly with the execution time in TMT A ( r = 0.372, p = 0.030) and TMT B ( r = 0.567, p

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive Functions and Memory · Computer Science · Neuroscience · Older Adults Driving Studies · Psychology · Technology Use by Older Adults

  • Modeling Users' Cognitive Performance Using Digital Pen Features

    Open Access•Jennifer Duyne Barenstein, Alexander Prange et al.•Frontiers in Artificial…•2022

  • Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.

    Domenic V Cicchetti•Psychological Assessment•1994

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae