Emotions in motion
How fear and anger differently influence forward single-step initiation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21533640 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Laure Coudrat (0000-0002-4206-5350, Université de Toulon, corresponding author), Stéphanie Caharel (0000-0002-3639-3462, Interpsy), Jean‐Luc Kop (0000-0002-6963-8411, Laboratoire lorrain de psychologie et neurosciences de la dynamique des comportements), Loïc P Heurley (0000-0002-8185-6083, Université de Montpellier) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0340-0727 • E-ISSN: 1430-2772 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00426-026-02317-2 |
| PMID | 42240686 |
| OpenAlex | W7163563782 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 52 |
The perception of emotional faces plays a critical role in shaping human motor responses. However, the relationship between perceived facial expressions, particularly fear, and approach-related movement remains unclear as prior research often employed ambiguous approach behaviour and tasks requiring emotion identification before action planning, potentially introducing biases from differences in recognition accuracy across emotions. To address these limitations, we examined the effect of emotional (fearful, angry, happy) faces on unambiguous approach-related movement, i.e., forward single-step initiation by using a go/no-go paradigm, in two conditions: a neutral-versus-emotional condition (motor responses depended on whether the face was emotional or neutral), or a face-gender condition. Results showed that the perception of emotional faces impacted forward single-step initiation in the neutral-versus-emotional condition only. More precisely, the motor response was stronger (higher anticipatory postural adjustments amplitude) in front of fearful and happy faces than angry faces, and faster (shorter time to reach the forward velocity peak of the centre of body mass) to fearful than to angry faces. This modulation of approach-related motor response, with facilitation of motor output for fearful relative to angry faces, may reflect a more effective preparation of forward stepping when the emotional information is compatible with the movement. Furthermore, the fact that emotional effects were observed only in the neutral-versus-emotional condition can be interpreted in terms of whether the emotional information was task-relevant or incidental
Anger · Emotion Perception · Emotional expression · Facial expression · Facilitation · Perception · Action Observation and Synchronization · Face Recognition and Perception · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces
An R 2 statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model
Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex.
The Psychophysics Toolbox
Simr
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
LmerTest Package
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior
What do facial expressions convey
Why do fearful facial expressions elicit behavioral approach? Evidence from a combined approach-avoidance implicit association test
Angry and happy expressions affect forward gait initiation only when task relevant
Emotion and motivation I
Autobiographically recalled emotional states impact forward gait initiation as a function of motivational direction
The Effects of Fear and Anger Facial Expressions on Approach- and Avoidance-Related Behaviors
Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces
Movement direction or change in distance? Self- and object-related approach–avoidance motions
Bring it on
Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology
What Good Are Positive Emotions
Anger is an approach-related affect
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |