Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task

A signal detection theory perspective

Bibliographic Data

ID21533665
AuthorsAman Bedi (University of Canterbury), Paul N Russell (University of Canterbury), William S Helton (George Mason University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume87
Issue2
Pages509-518
Publication date2023-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0340-0727 • E-ISSN: 1430-2772
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s00426-022-01679-7
PMID35403969
OpenAlexW4223469958
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited51

Cognitive psychology · Commission · Detection theory · Disengagement theory · Go/no go · Response bias · Computer Science · Medicine · Mind wandering and attention · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology · Sleep and Wakefulness Research · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Response uncertainty influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task

    Open Access•Aman Bedi, Paul N Russell et al.•Psychological Research•2024

  • Behavioral impulse and time pressure jointly influence intentional inhibition

    Open Access•Mengsi Xu, Jiayu Wen et al.•Psychological Research•2024

  • Oops!'

    Open Access•Ian H Robertson, Tom Manly et al.•Neuropsychologia•1997

  • Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering

    Open Access•Kalina Christoff, Alan Gordon et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2009

  • Conducting the train of thought

    Jennifer C Mcvay, Michael J Kane•Journal of Experimental…•2009

  • Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm

    Open Access•Frederick Verbruggen, Gordon D Logan•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2008

  • Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science

    Open Access•Andrew Clark, Andy Clark•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2013

  • Age differences in sustained attention tasks

    Open Access•Antonino Vallesi, Virginia Tronelli et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2021

  • Attention failures versus misplaced diligence

    Open Access•Paul Seli, James Allan Cheyne et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2012

  • Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (Sart)

    Open Access•William S Helton, Lena Weil et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2010

  • The Attention-Lapse and Motor Decoupling accounts of Sart performance are not mutually exclusive

    Open Access•Paul Seli•Consciousness and Cognition•2016

  • Mindfulness and mind-wandering

    Michael D Mrazek, Jonathan Smallwood et al.•Emotion•2012

  • Signal Probability and Vigilance

    Open Access•A D Baddeley, Alan Baddeley et al.•British Journal of Psychology•1969

  • Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix

    Donald T Campbell, Donald W Fiske•Psychological Bulletin•1959

Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae