Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Learning of across- and within-task contingencies modulates partial-repetition costs in dual-tasking

Bibliographic Data

ID21533720
AuthorsLasse Pelzer (0000-0002-4459-159X, TH Köln - University of Applied Sciences, corresponding author), Christoph Naefgen (0000-0002-5804-1169, FernUniversität in Hagen), Robert Gaschler (0000-0002-8576-5330, FernUniversität in Hagen), Hilde Haider (0000-0001-7293-3166, University of Cologne)
Year2022
Volume86
Issue3
Pages952-967
Publication date2022-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0340-0727 • E-ISSN: 1430-2772
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s00426-021-01518-1
PMID33885955
OpenAlexW3154173496
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited58

Dual-task costs might result from confusions on the task-set level as both tasks are not represented as distinct task-sets, but rather being integrated into a single task-set. This suggests that events in the two tasks are stored and retrieved together as an integrated memory episode. In a series of three experiments, we tested for such integrated task processing and whether it can be modulated by regularities between the stimuli of the two tasks (across-task contingencies) or by sequential regularities within one of the tasks (within-task contingencies). Building on the experimental approach of feature binding in action control, we tested whether the participants in a dual-tasking experiment will show partial-repetition costs: they should be slower when only the stimulus in one of the two tasks is repeated from Trial n − 1 to Trial n than when the stimuli in both tasks repeat. In all three experiments, the participants processed a visual-manual and an auditory-vocal tone-discrimination task which were always presented concurrently. In Experiment 1, we show that retrieval of Trial n − 1 episodes is stable across practice if the stimulus material is drawn randomly. Across-task contingencies (Experiment 2) and sequential regularities within a task (Experiment 3) can compete with n − 1-based retrieval leading to a reduction of partial-repetition costs with practice. Overall the results suggest that participants do not separate the processing of the two tasks, yet, within-task contingencies might reduce integrated task processing

Cognitive psychology · Human multitasking · Speech recognition · Action Observation and Synchronization · Computer Science · Motor Control and Adaptation · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology

  • Response modalities and the cognitive architecture underlying action control

    Open Access•Lisa Weller, Aleks Pieczykolan et al.•Cognition•2022

  • Task-separation in dual-tasking

    Open Access•Lasse Pelzer, Jannika Haffmann et al.•Acta Psychologica•2022

  • Investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual-task situations

    Open Access•leif erik langsdorf, Sebastian Kübler et al.•Acta Psychologica•2022

  • Variable, sometimes absent, but never negative

    Open Access•Christoph Naefgen, Robert Gaschler•Acta Psychologica•2024

  • Given the option, people avoid incongruent responses in a dual-tasking situation

    Open Access•Christoph Naefgen, Robert Gaschler et al.•Acta Psychologica•2022

  • Task integration in complex, bimanual sequence learning tasks

    Open Access•Patrick Beißel, Stefan Künzell•Psychological Research•2024

  • Element-level features in conjoint episodes in dual-tasking

    Open Access•Lasse Pelzer, Christoph Naefgen et al.•Psychological Research•2023

  • Can frequent long stimulus onset ansynchronies (SOAs) foster the representation of two separated task-sets in dual-tasking

    Open Access•Lasse Pelzer, Christoph Naefgen et al.•Psychological Research•2024

  • Attentional requirements of learning

    Open Access•Mary Jo Nissen, Peter Bullemer•Cognitive Psychology•1987

  • Event Files

    Bernhard Hommel•Visual Cognition•1998

  • The Theory of Event Coding (TEC)

    Open Access•Bernhard Hommel, Jochen Müsseler et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2001

  • Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations.

    Gordon D Logan, Robert D Gordon•Psychological Review•2001

  • Event files

    Open Access•Bernhard Hommel•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2004

  • A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance

    David E Meyer, David Kieras•Psychological Review•1997

  • Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis

    Open Access•Jeffrey N Rouder, Paul L Speckman et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2009

  • Toward an instance theory of automatization.

    Gordon D Logan•Psychological Review•1988

  • The disintegration of event files over time

    Open Access•Bernhard Hommel, Christian Frings•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2020

  • Sequential modulation of across-task congruency in the serial reaction time task

    Open Access•Fang Zhao, Robert Gaschler et al.•Acta Psychologica•2020

  • An old problem

    Open Access•Hilde Haider, Alexandra Eichler et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2011

  • Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking—An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research

    Iring Koch, Edita Poljac et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2018

  • Dual-task interference in simple tasks

    Harold Pashler•Psychological Bulletin•1994

Unique citing works8
Citations per year2
Citation span2022 - 2024 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae