Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The alignment of knowledge focus during teaching preparation and AI-powered learning-by-teaching and their effects on mathematics learning outcomes in the context of high-stakes state assessments

Bibliographic Data

ID21538331
AuthorsMingjia Hu (0000-0002-8680-6077, Indiana University Bloomington), Rui Guo (0000-0002-0762-839X, Florida College), Hai Li (0000-0001-6577-2050, University of Florida), Chenglu Li (0000-0002-1782-0457, University of Florida, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume251
Pages105642
Publication date2026-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueComputers & Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0360-1315 • E-ISSN: 1873-782X
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105642
OpenAlexW7154454821
LanguageEN
References cited48

The learning-by-teaching paradigm, particularly with AI-powered teachable agents, has shown particular promise for mathematics education. Despite this potential, it remains unclear how to best balance conceptual and procedural knowledge in this paradigm to optimize learning. This study addresses that question by examining how students' knowledge focus during two learning phases, preparing for teaching by watching instructional videos and active learning by teaching an AI-powered teachable agent, influences test performance. Specifically, we analyzed the increase in high-stakes state assessment scores over 3 months among 169 middle school students based on the knowledge focus (conceptual vs. procedural) they adopted while watching videos and subsequently teaching the AI agent. Results indicated that the effectiveness of pedagogical practices was moderated by learner preparedness. We found that average students enrolled in the regular-grade courses achieved the highest learning gains when adopting a complementary approach: watching concept-focused instructional videos followed by procedure-focused learning-by-teaching activity. On the other hand, students enrolled in the accelerated-grade courses, who served as the higher-preparedness group, showed the highest learning gains when using a consistent, concept-focused approach across both learning modalities. These findings suggest that the higher-preparedness group would benefit from instruction and practice that both emphasize conceptual knowledge. In comparison, average students would learn more effectively when teaching others in a way that complements, rather than mirrors, how they were initially taught

Context effect · Knowledge level · Educational Assessment and Pedagogy · Educational Leadership and Innovation · Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies

  • Cognitive Load Theory

    John Sweller•The psychology of learning and…•2011

  • Domain-specific prior knowledge and learning

    Bianca A Simonsmeier, Maja Flaig et al.•Educational Psychologist•2022

  • A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education

    Open Access•Michael Bond, Hassan Khosravi et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design

    Open Access•John Sweller•Learning and Instruction•1994

  • Isometric Logratio Transformations for Compositional Data Analysis

    Open Access•Juan José Egozcue, V Pawlowsky-Glahn et al.•Mathematical Geology•2003

  • Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices

    Open Access•Michelene T H Chi, T H Michelene et al.•Cognitive Science•1981

  • Expertise Reversal Effect and Its Implications for Learner-Tailored Instruction

    Open Access•Slava Kalyuga•Educational Psychology Review•2007

  • Understanding Tutor Learning

    Open Access•Rod D Roscoe, Michelene T H Chi et al.•Review of Educational Research•2007

  • Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities

    Aannemarie Sullivan Palinscar, Ann L Brown•Cognition and Instruction•1984

  • Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics

    Bethany Rittle‐johnson, Bethany Rittle-Johnson et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2001

  • The role of teachable agents’ personality traits on student-AI interactions and math learning

    Open Access•Bailing Lyu, Chenglu Li et al.•Computers & Education•2025

  • Development of a generative AI ‐powered teachable agent for middle school mathematics learning

    Open Access•Wanli Xing, Yukyeong Song et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2025

  • A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework

    Andrew J Elliot, Holly A Mcgregor•Journal of Personality and Social…•2001

  • The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits

    Edward L Deci, Richard M Ryan•Psychological Inquiry•2000

  • Iterating between lessons on concepts and procedures can improve mathematics knowledge

    Open Access•Bethany Rittle‐johnson, Kenneth Koedinger et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2009

  • An alternative time for telling

    Open Access•Emily R Fyfe, Marci S Decaro et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2014

  • Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner

    Barry J Zimmerman•Theory Into Practice•2002

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae