Early Christian Reception of Epicureanism
Didactic and Psychagogic Resonances
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21539408 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marc Mastrangelo (Dickinson College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 276-301 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Illinois Classical Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0363-1923 • E-ISSN: 2328-5265 |
| Publisher | University of Illinois Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5406/23285265.50.2.06 |
| OpenAlex | W7124147472 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 20 |
This paper begins with a brief survey of modern scholarly approaches to the early Christian, patristic reception of Epicureanism. Having established this context of reception, I argue that early Christian poets mirror the didacticism and psychagogy seen in the Epicurean poetic tradition as established by Epicurus, Philodemus, Lucretius, and Horace. Unlike previous studies of early Christian reception of Epicureanism (Rapisarda [1951], Jungkuntz [1962], and Erler [2024]), my argument highlights early Christian poetry as the literature of reception that affirmatively adapts specific aspects of Epicurean tradition, which harmonizes the traditional opposition between poetry and philosophy/doctrine
Didacticism · Early Christianity · Epicureanism · Patristics · Poetry · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Intertextuality in Late Latin Poetry
Horace between Freedom and Slavery
Lucretius and later Latin literature in antiquity
The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius
Lucretius and previous poetic traditions
Greek and Roman Aesthetics
Lucretius Poet and Philosopher
The poetics of Latin didactic
The Decline of Poetry in the Fourth-Century West
Epicurean Ethics in Horace
Epicureanism in Renaissance Moral and Natural Philosophy
Christianity as Philosophy
Christian Approval of Epicureanism
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |