From cobot to carbon
A computational framework for mapping AI's environmental impact on TikTok discourse through ecolinguistics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21544834 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Qinghao Guan (0000-0003-0062-4502, University of Zurich, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 117 |
| Pages | 101857 |
| Publication date | 2026-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0388-0001 • E-ISSN: 1873-5746 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.langsci.2026.101857 |
| OpenAlex | W7166816743 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
Artificial intelligence, especially large language models, has rapidly entered everyday life, yet public attention to their environmental footprint has lagged behind discussions of capability, ethics, and governance. Addressing this visibility gap, this study develops a three-level computational framework grounded in ecolinguistics environmental communication to examine how TikTok discourse constructs GenAI's environmental impact. We analyzed related TikTok videos with a multi-method pipeline integrating techniques in computational linguistics and corpus linguistics, including semantic network, linguistic feature analysis, topic-modeling, concordance, and sentiment analysis. Results indicate a strongly asymmetric action structure in which technological and infrastructural entities are positioned as dominant agents, while environmental entities appear primarily as affected resources. Verbs linked to environmental objects are dominated by “ use ” and other harm-oriented actions, with few mitigation-oriented relations. The topic hierarchy is centered on AI's environmental burdens, with only limited attention to benefit frames. Responsibility discourse frequently mentions necessity and obligation, and the emotional profile is heavily skewed toward fear. The framework demonstrates how ecolinguistic concerns can be operationalized at scale while remaining interpretable through corpus-based contextual inspection. Codes and data are available on GitHub 1
Discourse analysis · Pragmatics · Sustainability · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Digital Education and Society · Misinformation and Its Impacts
Students’ voices on generative AI
Crowdsourcing a Word–emotion Association Lexicon
Computational assessment of text readability
Topic modeling three decades of climate change news in Denmark
Language and ecology
“We're the Ones to Blame”
Enchanted Determinism
Implementing Environmental Communication Strategy Towards Climate Change Through Social Media in Indonesia
Narratives of industrial damage and natural recovery
The environmental footprint of data centers in the United States
Understanding #WorldEnvironmentDay User Opinions in Twitter
Topic modeling for frame analysis
Exploring climate change discourses on the internet
Communicating Climate Change
Relatio
The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives
Approaches to the Anthropocene from Communication and Media Studies
Ecolinguistics
Ecological approaches in linguistics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|