Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The impact of mismatched recordings on an automatic-speaker-recognition system and human listeners

Bibliographic Data

ID21550641
AuthorsTomáš Nechanský (Charles University), Tomáš Bořil (0000-0002-5839-313X, Charles University), Alžběta Houzar (Charles University), Radek Skarnitzl (0000-0002-5682-1962, Charles University)
Year2023
Volume2022
Issue1
Pages11-22
Publication date2023-01-17
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAUC PHILOLOGICA (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0567-8269 • E-ISSN: 2464-6830
PublisherCharles University in Prague, Karolinum Press (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.14712/24646830.2022.25
OpenAlexW4316690048
LanguageEN
References cited22

The so-called ‘mismatch’ is a factor which experts in the forensic voice comparison field encounter regularly. Therefore, we decided to explore to what extent the automatic-speaker-recognition system’s and the earwitness’ ability to identify speakers is influenced when recordings are acquired in different languages and at different times. 100 voices in a database of 300 recordings (100 speakers recorded in three mutually mismatched sessions) were compared with an automatic-speaker-recognition software VOCALISE based on i-vectors and x-vectors, and by 39 respondents in simulated voice parades. Both the automatic and perceptual approach seem to have yielded similar results in that the less complex the mismatch type, the more successful the identification. The results point to the superiority of the x-vector approach, and also to varying identification abilities of listeners

Perception · Speaker identification · Speaker recognition · Speech recognition · Computer Science · Mathematics · Music and Audio Processing · Psychology · Speech and Audio Processing · Speech Recognition and Synthesis · Artificial Intelligence

  • PsyToolkit

    Open Access•Gijsbert Stoet•Behavior Research Methods•2010

  • PsyToolkit

    Open Access•Gijsbert Stoet•Teaching of Psychology•2017

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • Aging effects on voice features used in forensic speaker comparison

    Richard Rhodes•International Journal of Speech…•2017

  • Aural and automatic forensic speaker recognition in mismatched conditions

    Anil Alexander, Damien Dessimoz et al.•International Journal of Speech…•2005

  • Individual patterns of disfluency across speaking styles

    Kirsty Mcdougall, Martin Duckworth•International Journal of Speech…•2018

  • Speaker discrimination in a foreign language

    Kirk P H Sullivan, Frank Schlichting•International Journal of Speech…•2000

  • The effect of removing linguistic information upon identifying speakers of a foreign language

    Niels O Schiller, Olaf Köster et al.•International Journal of Speech…•1997

  • Aural-perceptual speaker identification

    Harry Hollien, Reva Schwartz•International Journal of Speech…•2000

  • Tuning the performance of automatic speaker recognition in different conditions

    Radek Skarnitzl, Maral Asiaee et al.•International Journal of Speech…•2020

  • Foreign accent in voice discrimination

    Henry Rogers•International Journal of Speech…•1998

  • Examining the implications of speech accommodation for forensic speaker comparison casework

    Open Access•Katherine Earnshaw•Journal of Phonetics•2021

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae