Transformative learning within Australian Indigenous studies
A scoping review of non-Indigenous student experiences in tertiary Indigenous studies education
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21555939 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan Bullen (0000-0003-0437-2541, Curtin University, Perth, Australia, corresponding author), Lynne D Roberts (0000-0003-0085-9213, Curtin University, Perth, Australia) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 162-177 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Higher Education Research & Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0729-4360 • E-ISSN: 1469-8366 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/07294360.2020.1852184 |
| OpenAlex | W3124852086 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 30 |
Transformative learning theory is widely considered one of the pre-eminent theories of adult education, and has been adopted as a means of developing and understanding adult learning across a range of disciplines. While the representation and conceptualisation of transformative learning experiences has grown within Australian Indigenous studies curriculum contexts, significant differences are apparent in the means of engagement with Mezirow’s theoretical framework. This article adopts Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodology to establish what is known about non-Indigenous student transformative learning within the Australian Indigenous studies literature, and provide recommendations for future research that can inform the use of Mezirow’s theory within Indigenous Australian studies curricular contexts. Four databases were systematically searched for papers focusing on transformative learning experiences of non-Indigenous students within Australian tertiary Indigenous Studies contexts, with 17 papers published between 1978 and 2019 included in the final analysis. While findings suggest the fundamental building blocks of Mezirow’s theory are quite well understood, they also highlight gaps in the literature. First, questions remain around the enduring effects of transformative learning outcomes. Second, associations between transformative learning theory and cultural capability development appear to lack clarity. Third, associations between transformative learning and Indigenous health outcomes are unclear. Finally, there is a need for more diverse paradigms, methods and methodologies within transformative learning research
Curriculum · Indigenous · Indigenous Education · Pedagogy · Sociology · Transformative learning · Adult and Continuing Education Topics · Global Educational Policies and Reforms · Psychology · Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development · Ecology
Transformative Learning as Discourse
Transformative Learning as a Metatheory
The theory of communicative action
The ‘Pedagogy of discomfort’
To be Transformed
Towards cultural competence
Critical Reflexivity in Indigenous and Cross‐cultural Psychology
Perspective Transformation
Scoping studies
Revisiting 'how we learn' in academia
Transformative Learning
Driving Transformative Learning within Australian Indigenous Studies
(Not)Knowing
Pearls, Problems and Politics
Pearls, not Problems
Reflective Teaching Practice in a Darug Classroom
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |