Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Mangbaerye Examinations

Ming Loyalist Court Rituals and Royal Authority in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Chosŏn

Bibliographic Data

ID21557532
AuthorsSeunghyun Han (0000-0003-4012-4887, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume27
Issue1
Pages3-36
Publication date2022-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe journal of Korean studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0731-1613 • E-ISSN: 2158-1665
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/07311613-9474266
OpenAlexW4226528083
LanguageEN
References cited15

During the reigns of Yŏngjo (r. 1724–76) and Chŏngjo (r. 1776–1800), royal audiences and tests were established as important components of the mangbaerye-day events. For the two rulers, the audience was an occasion to use the significance of the rituals to justify bureaucratic promotions for the attendees. The literary and military tests on mangbaerye days were systematized by Yŏngjo and administered by the ruler as a stage in the state examination. By assuming leading ideological roles through rituals, Yŏngjo was able to present the image of a sage-ruler with supreme political and ideological authority. Chŏngjo refrained from bestowing examination privileges in the mangbaerye tests, making the mangbaerye days special occasions for disseminating Ming loyalism. In the nineteenth century, the frequency of Ming loyalist rituals was significantly reduced, and royal audiences came to a complete halt. Moreover, the rituals incrementally lost ground as events for highlighting the importance of the ritual attendees. The mangbaerye-day tests in the nineteenth century served as a venue to promote participating families’ political advancement, rather than as an occasion to bolster the monarchical authority and power

Bureaucracy · Ideology · Legitimacy · Monarchy · Political science · Politics · Ruler · Sociology · Supreme court · Asian Culture and Media Studies · Chinese history and philosophy · Classics · History · Japanese History and Culture · Law

  • Lies, Rumours and Sino-Korean Relations

    Open Access•Adam Bohnet, ADAM BOHNET ADAM BOHNET•Acta Koreana•2016

  • Ming Loyalist Families and the Changing Meanings of Chojong’am in Early Nineteenth-Century Chosŏn

    Open Access•Seunghyun Han, Seunghyun Han Seunghyun Han•Acta Koreana•2018

  • Besieged on a Frozen Mountain Top

    Open Access•Thomas Quartermain, Thomas Quartermain Thomas Quartermain•Acta Koreana•2018

  • The Guan Yu Cult and Joseon-Qing Visions of State Legitimacy, 1882-1894

    Open Access•Joshua Van Lieu, Joshua Van Lieu Joshua Van Lieu•The Review of Korean Studies•2019

  • From Liaodongese Refugee to Ming Loyalist

    Open Access•Adam Bohnet, Adam Clarence Bohnet Adam Clarence Bohnet•The Review of Korean Studies•2012

  • Confucian Gentlemen and Barbarian Envoys

    Julius W Pratt•The SHAFR Guide Online•2017

  • Provincializing Korea

    Yuanchong Wang•T oung Pao•2019

  • Ruling Ideology and Marginal Subjects

    Adam Bohnet•Journal of Early Modern History•2011

  • The East Asian War, 1592–1598

    Louis G Perez•Asian Studies Review•2015

  • Rhetoric, Ritual, and Political Legitimacy

    Open Access•Don Baker, DON BAKER DON BAKER•Korea Journal•2013

  • Culture of Remembrance in Late Choson Korea

    Open Access•S J Kim•Journal of Social History•2010

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae