Implementing and Evaluating Manualized Interventions in U.S. Organizations Serving Youth with Foster Care Experience
Lessons Learned from the Field
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21559859 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amy M Salazar (0000-0002-5392-6275, Washington State University Vancouver, corresponding author), Sara S Spiers (Washington State University Vancouver), Jenna Thompson (0009-0003-1269-7749, Washington State University Vancouver), Jaidyanne Podsobinski (0000-0002-2297-4880, Washington State University Vancouver), Maddy Day |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 765-781 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0738-0151 • E-ISSN: 1573-2797 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10560-024-00989-6 |
| OpenAlex | W4403761464 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 33 |
The goal of the current study is to glean lessons learned from the Fostering Higher Education (FHE) intervention evaluation study to provide concrete strategies for helping other youth-serving organizations overcome barriers to participating in manualized intervention implementation and evaluation. Specifically, this study assesses lessons learned in organizations that serve youth with foster care experience regarding (1) implementing FHE in relation to (a) site preparation, (b) implementation, and (c) pursuing racial equity in practice; and (2) participating in research/evaluation. This study involves qualitative analyses of surveys, emails, and meeting notes from FHE implementation staff, supervisors, administrative staff, and TA providers across three study sites in the United States. Surveys assessed lessons learned by site implementation staff during the FHE implementation and evaluation process, as well as quarterly assessments of the technical assistance for implementation and evaluation provided to FHE implementation sites by the research team. Emails and meeting notes provided insights into sites’ implementation- and research/evaluation-related experiences and challenges as they were happening during the study. Communication/collaboration were key for the success of both implementation and evaluation of FHE, while training and technology were also key for implementation, and project timing and understanding the value of research were important for evaluation participation. Key themes regarding the pursuit of racial equity in FHE practice included the importance of collective learning, independent practice, and client-centered program delivery. A variety of recommendations for other youth-serving organizations interested in implementing and evaluating manualized interventions are provided based on the study’s findings
Foster care · Medical education · Political science · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Public relations · Child Welfare and Adoption · Counseling Practices and Supervision · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies
Implementation of Evidence-based Practice in Child Welfare
Research design
Research electronic data capture (Redcap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
The Redcap consortium
Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes
Evaluation Capacity and Nonprofit Organizations
Core Implementation Components
Characteristics of the front-line child welfare workforce
Factors influencing child welfare employee's turnover
Who's on board? Child welfare worker reports of buy-in and readiness for organizational change
Fostering Higher Education
Implementation of an evidence-based intervention to reduce long-term foster care
Overcoming challenges to implementing and evaluating evidence-based interventions in child welfare
Fostering Higher Education
Perceptions Among Child Welfare Staff when Modifying A Child Mental Health Intervention to be Implemented in Child Welfare Services
Community-Based Participatory Research Contributions to Intervention Research
| Highly cited | No |
|---|