Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

From Personal Network to Institution Building

The Lifanyuan, Gift Exchange and the Formalization of Manchu-Mongol Relations

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2156359
AutoresDorothea Heuschert-Laage (0009-0009-6121-8023, North-West State Technical University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2014
Volumen25
Número5
Páginas648-669
Fecha de publicación2014-10-20
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHistory and Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0275-7206 • E-ISSN: 1477-2612
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02757206.2014.946022
OpenAlexW2022145120
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas29

The Qing emperors, who ruled over China from 1644 to 1911, managed to bring large parts of Inner Asia under their control and extended the territory of China to an unprecedented degree. This paper maintains that the political technique of patronage with its formalized language, its emphasis on gift exchange and expressions of courtesy is a useful concept for explaining the integration of Inner Asian confederations into the empire. By re-interpreting the obligations of gift exchange, the Qing transformed the network of personal relationships, which had to be reinforced and consolidated permanently, into a system with clearly defined rules. In this process of formalization, the Lifanyuan, the Court for the Administration of the Outer Regions, played a key role. While in the early years of the dynasty, it was responsible for collecting and disseminating information concerning the various patronage relationships with Inner Asian leaders, over the course of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries its efforts were directed at standardizing and streamlining the contacts between ethnic minorities and the state. Through the Lifanyuan, the rules and principles of patronage were maintained in a modified form even in the later part of the dynasty, when the Qing exercised control in the outer regions more directly. The paper provides an explanation for the longevity and cohesiveness of the multi-ethnic Qing Empire. Based on recently published Manchu and Mongol language archival material and the Maussian concept of gift exchange, the study sheds new light on the changing self-conception of the Qing emperors

China · Courtesy · Empire · Ethnic group · Institution · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Chinese history and philosophy · Computer Science · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History · Japanese History and Culture · Law

  • Contesting the Confucian peace

    Open Access•Andrew Phillips•European Journal of International…•2018

  • Cherishing Men from Afar

    James L Hevia•Cherishing Men from Afar•1995

  • Political Frontiers, Ethnic Boundaries and Human Geographies in Chinese History

    Nicola Di Cosmo, Don J Wyatt•Political Frontiers, Ethnic…•2005

  • Manchu-Mongol Relations on the Eve of the Qing Conquest

    Nicola Di Cosmo, Dalizhabu Bao•Manchu-Mongol Relations on the…•2003

  • The Culture of Giving

    Open Access•Ilana Krausman Ben-Amos, Ilana Krausman Ben‐Amos•Culture of Giving•2008

  • Constructing Suiyuan

    Justin Tighe•Constructing Suiyuan•2005

  • Our Great Qing

    Johan Elverskog•Our Great Qing•2017

  • China Marches West

    Open Access•Peter C Perdue•China Marches West•2005

  • Social Solidarity and the Gift

    Open Access•Aafke Komter, Aafke E Komter•Social Solidarity and the Gift•2004

  • The Gift

    Marcel Mauss•Gift•2002

  • Historical Anthropology in Eurasia “… and the Way Thither”

    Dittmar Schorkowitz•History and Anthropology•2012

  • Patronage in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century France

    Adrian Armstrong•Sixteenth Century Journal•2003

  • Why Did the Kangxi Emperor Go to Wutai Shan

    Natalie Köhle•Late imperial China•2008

  • Worshiping Grace

    Christopher P Atwood•Late imperial China•2000

  • The Lifanyuan and the Inner Asian Rituals in the Early Qing (1644-1795)

    Ning Chia, Chia Ning•Late imperial China•1993

  • China's Last Empire

    Jeremiah Jenne•The Chinese Historical Review•2010

  • China and Other Colonial Empires

    Peter C Perdue•Journal of American-East Asian…•2009

  • Legal Pluralism in the Qing Empire

    Dorothea Heuschert•The International History Review•1998

  • Emperor as Bodhisattva in The Governance of The Ch'ing Empire

    David M Farquhar, David Μ Farquhar•Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies•1978

  • The Modern History of Mongolia

    Geoffrey Wheeler•International Affairs•1969

  • Patrons, Clients, and Empire

    C W Newbury, Colin Newbury•Patrons, clients, and empire•2003

  • Patronage in Early Modern France

    Sharon Kettering•French Historical Studies•1992

  • Gifts, commodities, and social relations

    Open Access•James G Carrier, James Carrier•Sociological Forum•1991

  • Gift-Giving and Patronage in Early Modern France

    Sharon Kettering•French History•1988

  • Manzhou yuanliu kao and the Formalization of the Manchu Heritage

    Open Access•Pamela Kyle Crossley•The Journal of Asian Studies•1987

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,13
Intervalo de citas2018 - 2018 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae