Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Initiating Collaboration in the Midst of a Standoff

What to Do at that Critical Moment

Bibliographic Data

ID21564773
AuthorsLawrence Susskind (corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume36
Issue2
Pages141-151
Publication date2020-04-28
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNegotiation Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0748-4526 • E-ISSN: 1571-9979
PublisherMIT Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1111/nejo.12318
OpenAlexW3014429340
LanguageEN
References cited3

Even when “warring parties” know that eventually they will have to talk to one another so that there can be peace, it is extremely difficult to get them to “fast-forward” to that moment. The reasons for this vary. Sometimes the parties think that “time is on their side”—that continuing the battle will benefit them. Other times, leaders worry how they will appear in the eyes of their own followers if they seem to have lost heart or are ready to give in. A third reason that parties may not initiate talks is their concern that a willingness to do so may lead the other side to assume that they are ready to give up. This article examines a new way of helping parties move forward in such situations using what is called “breakthrough collaboration,” an idea invented by the Consensus Building Institute. Breakthrough collaboration allows parties to take advantage of a critical moment to initiate preliminary trust-building activities, share information and send messages through a neutral party, and engage in internal efforts that can make it easier to move toward joint problem-solving. Such efforts can be triggered by a convener (who is not a party) and assisted by a mediator (who may not meet with the parties simultaneously). The goal is to do more than merely encourage dialogue. The hope is that an extended sequence of facilitated activities or events can lead to a shift in thinking on all sides. The key is to know when a critical moment creates an opportunity for breakthrough collaboration

Battle · Business · Computer security · Law and economics · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Worry · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Computer Science · Conflict Management and Negotiation · Disaster Management and Resilience · Law · Psychology

  • Constructive conflicts

    Louis Kriesberg•Constructive conflicts•2007

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae