Two Accounts of International Tax Justice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21572149 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ivan Ozai (York University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 317-339 |
| Publication date | 2020-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0841-8209 • E-ISSN: 2056-4260 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/cjlj.2020.8 |
| OpenAlex | W3035659286 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
The contemporary international tax regime has been increasingly criticized over the years from varied perspectives, particularly as to the unfairness it produces for developing countries. Some commentators argue it is unjust due to the lack of participation of developing countries in the policymaking process on an equal footing. Others suggest the international tax regime was designed by affluent countries to respond to self-interested goals. Some note that its current institutional design creates opportunities for tax competition and avoidance, which more seriously affect developing economies due to their relative dependence on corporate income tax and their greater vulnerability to capital mobility. Others specifically criticize how taxing rights, that is, the entitlement of countries to tax cross-border transactions, are currently allocated between home and host countries and how they disfavour capital-importing, developing countries
Distributive justice · Economic Justice · Economics · Epistemology · Fallacy · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Normative · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Scholarship · Sociology · Corporate Taxation and Avoidance · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Taxation and Compliance Studies
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |