Русский след в некоторых удмуртских словах
О происхождении лексем вай, ӝожон, зол, нет, туж [Russian Trace in Some Udmurt Words: on the Origin of the Lexemes вай, ӝожон, зол, нет, and туж]
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21574908 |
|---|---|
| Authors | A Maksimov (0000-0002-5389-9502), S Maksimov (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 48-57 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-09 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Linguistica Uralica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0868-4731 • E-ISSN: 1736-7506 |
| Publisher | Estonian Academy Publishers (PUBLISHER • EE) |
| DOI | 10.3176/lu.2022.1.05 |
| OpenAlex | W4226000204 |
| Language | RU |
Russian borrowed vocabulary in Udmurt is well studied. A series of articles is devoted to this scientific topic, two doctoral dissertations have been defended, books and monographs were published. It is not difficult for a speaker of Russian to identify the majority of Russian borrowings. However, there is a group of words, mainly old borrowings, which have experienced phonetic adaptation and semantic changes. It requires considerable effort to identify such words as Russian borrowings and find their etymon. This article is devoted to the study of the origin of such lexical units, namely: Ð2аÐ1 â branch, boughâ , Ó Ð3⁄4жÐ3⁄4Ð1⁄2 â fried oat flour, and a dish prepared from itâ , зÐ3⁄4л â strong; stronglyâ , Ð1⁄2ÐμÑ â whim, caprice, capricious (absurd) desire; wishâ , Ñ Ñ Ð¶ â veryâ . The previously proposed etymologies of the words Ð2аÐ1, Ð1⁄2ÐμÑ and Ñ Ñ Ð¶ are clearly incorrect, other words require clarification of the source and additional description of phonetic adaptation and semantic changes. So, зÐ3⁄4л â strong; stronglyâ is traditionally considered a word of Common Permic origin. We assume that this word is not primordial, but borrowed from a Slavic type language - Proto-Slavic or Para-Baltoslavic in the Pre-Permian era
Linguistics · Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication · History · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|