Die Moderne zwischen Uneigentlichkeit und Eigentlichkeit

Bibliographic Data

ID21579331
AuthorsRosa Maria Marafioti (0000-0002-9780-5109, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume38
Issue1
Pages243-288
Publication date2022-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHeidegger Studies / Heidegger Studien / Etudes Heideggeriennes (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0885-4580 • E-ISSN: 2153-9170
PublisherDuncker & Humblot GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.3790/heist.38.1.243
OpenAlexW4312901262
LanguageDE
References cited27

Modernity between inauthenticity and authenticity. Heidegger, Lukács, Heller Heidegger, Lukács and Heller confronted the “crisis” of modernity already at the beginning of their own paths of thinking and asked how to address it. Lukács did never completely lose faith in politics, whereas Heidegger and Heller only briefly leant on a party to direct the course of history. Heidegger and Lukács described modern life as an “unowned” existence occasioned by the metaphysics’ “forgetfulness of Being” and the “reification of consciousness” in the late capitalism respectively. Whilst Heidegger entrusted the task of preparing a “turning” to the thinking of the truth of Being and Lukács assigned materialistic dialectic to undertake a revolution, Heller worked out an ethics of responsibility that can both keep under control the modernity’s “dark side” and make again fruitful in today’s multicultural society the main achievement of the modern age, that is, freedom

Consciousness · Dialectic · Epistemology · Materialism · Metaphysics · Modernity · Political science · Politics · Postmodernism · Psychoanalysis · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Psychoanalysis and Social Critique · Psychology

Tools

Open DOI