Evaluating Reasoning in Natural Arguments
A Procedural Approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21583161 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Martin Hinton (0000-0003-0374-8834, University of Lodz, corresponding author), Jean H M Wagemans (0000-0001-9304-5766, University of Amsterdam) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 61-84 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Argumentation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0920-427X • E-ISSN: 1572-8374 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10503-021-09555-1 |
| OpenAlex | W3202294040 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 10 |
In this paper, we formulate a procedure for assessing reasoning as it is expressed in natural arguments. The procedure is a specification of one of the three aspects of argumentation assessment distinguished in the Comprehensive Assessment Procedure for Natural Argumentation (CAPNA) (Hinton, 2021) that makes use of the argument categorisation framework of the Periodic Table of Arguments (PTA) (Wagemans, 2016, 2019, 2020c). The theoretical framework and practical application of both the CAPNA and the PTA are described, as well as the evaluation procedure that combines the two. The procedure is illustrated through an evaluation of the reasoning of two example arguments from a recently published text
Argumentation theory · Data mining · Epistemology · Management science · Natural language processing · Computer Science · Engineering · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Artificial Intelligence
Vybrané problémy argumentačných schém v pragma-dialektickom prístupe k argumentácii
Decoding persuasion
Argumentation and Language in Identity Construction
Finding the Missing Link
Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation
Argumentation and Identity
How to identify an argument type? On the hermeneutics of persuasive discourse
| Citations per year | 1.75 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |