Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An Unconscious Universal in the Mind is Like an Immaterial Dinner in the Stomach. A Debate on Logical Generalism (1914–1919)

Bibliographic Data

ID21583333
AuthorsHubert Marraud (0000-0003-4039-1010, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume36
Issue4
Pages569-593
Publication date2022-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueArgumentation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0920-427X • E-ISSN: 1572-8374
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10503-022-09580-8
OpenAlexW4296098883
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited26

The debate on the a fortiori and the universal that took place between April 1914 and April 1919 in the journal Mind has a double interest for argumentation theorists. First, the discussion is an example of a philosophical polylogue that exhibits the characteristics of a quasi-engaged dialogue (Blair Blair, J. A. (2012 [1998]). “The Limits of the Dialogue Model of Argument”. Argumentation 12, pp. 325–339. Reprinted in J.A. Blair, Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation, pp. 231–244. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.), confirming Blair’s hypothesis that journal papers and scholarly monographs can be analyzed as turns in non-engaged or quasi-engaged dialogues. It could be said that philosophical argumentation is dialectical but not dialogical. Second, the debate is a discussion in argumentation theory. Generalism in the theory of argument claims that the very possibility of arguing depends on a suitable supply of general rules that specify what kinds of conclusions can be drawn from what kinds of data, while particularism denies this. Although the terminology may be alien, I will also show that the debate on the a fortiori and the universal was a debate on generalism and particularism

Argumentation theory · Communication studies · Dialectic · Dialogical self · Epistemology · Informal logic · Social science · Sociology · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Philosophy · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education

  • A Particularist Approach to Arguments by Analogy

    Open Access•José Alhambra•Argumentation•2023

  • How Philosophers Argue

    Open Access•Fernando Leal Carretero, Fernando Leal et al.•How Philosophers Argue•2022

  • The Uses of Argument

    Open Access•Stephen Toulmin, Stephen Edelston Toulmin•Uses of Argument•2003

  • Introducing polylogue

    Open Access•Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni•Journal of Pragmatics•2004

  • Ethics Without Principles

    Jonathan Dancy•Ethics without principles•2004

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae